From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Bligh Subject: Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 6657] New: Domain validation failures on aic7xxx Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:06:23 -0700 Message-ID: <448D9F0F.4080106@mbligh.org> References: <20060606091840.a39afe5a.akpm@osdl.org> <1149956760.3335.18.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <448D9A92.1050406@mbligh.org> <1150131252.3413.25.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from dvhart.com ([64.146.134.43]:43162 "EHLO dvhart.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750968AbWFLRG0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:06:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1150131252.3413.25.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: william@brodie-tyrrell.org, Andrew Morton , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 09:47 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote: > >>It's not going to auto-forward, otherwise every update to bugs owned >>by >>the virtual alias will come through. What I was planning was to cc >>linux-scsi on emails to bugme-new (ie one email per new bug only) for >>that category only. I'll try to get that going this morning ... > > > Yes ... that's what we want. An email that can be replied to and will > go to the submitter and linux-scsi and be captured by bugzilla. OK, set up. It should reply to bugme-daemon, which should result up being back in the DB ... all emails should be tagged with [bugme-new] in them, so its easy to filter if need be. I cc'ed IO/storage-SCSI, and all the SCSI drivers ones. If that's not correct, or you have other problems with it, let me know. Hitting reply-all may result in mail to bugme-new as well as bugme-daemon ... a mild pain, but should get caught by the list filtration, so no big deal, I think. M.