From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Wilson Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 dislikes raid-1, just like mm4 Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:43:14 +0100 Message-ID: <44A7E992.4010201@zen.co.uk> References: <20060701033524.3c478698.akpm@osdl.org> <20060701181455.GA16412@aitel.hist.no> <20060701152258.bea091a6.akpm@osdl.org> <44A7560B.3050000@reub.net> <1151848394.3558.2.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <44A7D82A.80909@zen.co.uk> <1151852788.3558.10.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from pythagoras.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.140]:32489 "EHLO pythagoras.zen.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932386AbWGBPnW (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 11:43:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1151852788.3558.10.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Reuben Farrelly , Andrew Morton , Helge Hafting , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown James Bottomley wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:28 +0100, Grant Wilson wrote: >> With the patch applied to 2.6.17-mm5 my RAID-1 is up and running on both >> SATA drives with no problems. > > That's great, thanks. Now we know what the problem patch is, I'd like > to try an 11th our correction of the logic fault in the original. Could > you try this patch against original -mm (by reversing the previous > patch). I think it should correct the problem? > > Thanks, > > James > [snip] With the first patch reversed and the second applied to -mm5 my RAID-1 array is still working correctly on both disks. Thanks again, Grant