public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-lkml@reub.net>
To: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
Cc: Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 dislikes raid-1, just like mm4
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:52:34 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44A8BEB2.5020803@reub.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060702190719.GA815@aitel.hist.no>



On 3/07/2006 7:07 a.m., Helge Hafting wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 04:43:14PM +0100, Grant Wilson wrote:
>> James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:28 +0100, Grant Wilson wrote:
>>>> With the patch applied to 2.6.17-mm5 my RAID-1 is up and running on both
>>>> SATA drives with no problems.
>>> That's great, thanks.  Now we know what the problem patch is, I'd like
>>> to try an 11th our correction of the logic fault in the original.  Could
>>> you try this patch against original -mm (by reversing the previous
>>> patch).  I think it should correct the problem?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> With the first patch reversed and the second applied to -mm5 my RAID-1
>> array is still working correctly on both disks.
>>
> The patch makes 2.6.17-mm5 md work on SATA and SCSI for me too.
> 
> Helge Hafting

+1.  Fixes everything here up too.

So with two patches applied (this one and an unrelated MSI fix) I'm all up and 
running perfectly on -mm5.

Thanks,
Reuben

      reply	other threads:[~2006-07-03  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060701033524.3c478698.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found] ` <20060701142419.GB28750@tlg.swandive.local>
2006-07-01 21:30   ` 2.6.17-mm5 Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 22:26     ` 2.6.17-mm5 James Bottomley
2006-07-01 22:32       ` 2.6.17-mm5 Neil Brown
2006-07-01 22:56         ` 2.6.17-mm5 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-02  0:10           ` 2.6.17-mm5 James Bottomley
2006-07-01 22:29     ` More RAID / SATA / barrier problems [ Re: 2.6.17-mm5 ] Neil Brown
2006-07-01 22:54     ` 2.6.17-mm5 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-27 21:02     ` 2.6.17-mm5 Ming Zhang
     [not found] ` <20060701181455.GA16412@aitel.hist.no>
2006-07-01 22:22   ` 2.6.17-mm5 dislikes raid-1, just like mm4 Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 22:52     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-01 22:58       ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-02  4:43     ` Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-02  6:09       ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-02  5:13     ` Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-02 13:53       ` James Bottomley
2006-07-02 14:28         ` Grant Wilson
2006-07-02 15:06           ` James Bottomley
2006-07-02 15:43             ` Grant Wilson
2006-07-02 19:07               ` Helge Hafting
2006-07-03  6:52                 ` Reuben Farrelly [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44A8BEB2.5020803@reub.net \
    --to=reuben-lkml@reub.net \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=grant.wilson@zen.co.uk \
    --cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox