From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Douglas Gilbert Subject: Re: scsi scanning Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:43:55 -0400 Message-ID: <452125AB.9010504@torque.net> References: <20061001224431.88707.qmail@web31104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20061002023110.GI16272@parisc-linux.org> Reply-To: dougg@torque.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:2477 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932453AbWJBOma (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:42:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20061002023110.GI16272@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: "Jose L. Mazuela" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 03:44:31PM -0700, Jose L. Mazuela wrote: >> Excuse me, i've seen your message >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/1/196 >> and i'd want to indicate you, that i reproduce the behavior in this message >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/8/128 >> (acer prisa scan works with 2.6.15 and not with 2.6.16 and after) > > It's completely unrelated. Doug Gilbert probably knows what's going on > here. I'm not aware of scsi sane problems arising in lk 2.6.16 but I'm not surprised. Could Jose find some more debug data or a reference to a thread with more detailed information as I no longer have a scsi scanner. Doug Gilbert