From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi updates for post 2.6.18 Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:12:24 -0400 Message-ID: <45256728.2060004@garzik.org> References: <1159995678.3437.80.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <45255A02.2010308@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:51074 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751192AbWJEUM2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:12:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: James Bottomley , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel , linux-scsi Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Sure, it WOULD be nice, but I don't know how. The "don't know" refers to > the case 16MB block size, my tape supports only 16MB - 1 byte (according > to st report). Is there a way to test various block sizes with CDs / > hard-disks / ZIP / scanners? Would something with sg_dd work? Looks like > it must be only sector size. Can I low-level format a disk with 16M > sector?:-) > > Another possibility is to limit the block size at 8MB - I can test that. I would say, increase it to whatever the max is you can test... Jeff