From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: aic94xx IO errors with "escb_tasklet_complete: phy0: REQ_TASK_ABORT" Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:11:41 -0700 Message-ID: <4525831D.60104@us.ibm.com> References: <20061004164438.GC5091@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> <20061004132929.A29689@florence.linkmargin.com> <20061004205621.GF5091@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> <1159996277.3437.83.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <20061005215504.GB14186@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> Reply-To: "Darrick J. Wong" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:28356 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932315AbWJEWLo (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:11:44 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k95MBhk5023821 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:11:43 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id k95MBhYZ127122 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:11:43 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k95MBhHj029342 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:11:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20061005215504.GB14186@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Muli Ben-Yehuda Cc: James Bottomley , Andy Warner , linux-scsi Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > Thanks. I was hoping to get to it today but ended up chasing a genirq > bug in 2.6.19-rc1 > (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116008372309485&w=2) > instead. I'll update when I'll know more. I saw some aic94xx patches > going by - should I be doing the experiments on an aic94xx other than > what's in mainline? As far as I can tell, most of the patches that have gone by in the past day or two have been to fix various expander problems... which your x366 doesn't have. Though, it's possible that I've missed a patch or two. --D