* [PATCH] cleanup after a discovery error
@ 2006-10-19 3:19 malahal
2006-10-19 19:08 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: malahal @ 2006-10-19 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
Domain device is freed but the port dev list is not adjusted on some
discovery errors. Module unload will Oops if this happens.
Signed-off-by: Malahal Naineni <malahal@us.ibm.com>
diff -r 4e1720b3c71b drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c Thu Oct 05 10:02:13 2006 -0700
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c Fri Oct 13 19:58:54 2006 -0700
@@ -684,7 +684,23 @@ static void sas_discover_domain(void *da
}
if (error) {
- kfree(port->port_dev); /* not kobject_register-ed yet */
+ struct domain_device *dev = port->port_dev;
+
+ if (dev->rphy) {
+ sas_remove_children(&dev->rphy->dev);
+ sas_rphy_delete(dev->rphy);
+ dev->rphy = NULL;
+ }
+ if (dev->dev_type == EDGE_DEV || dev->dev_type == FANOUT_DEV) {
+ if (dev->ex_dev.ex_phy) {
+ kfree(dev->ex_dev.ex_phy);
+ dev->ex_dev.ex_phy = NULL;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_lock(&port->dev_list_lock);
+ list_del_init(&dev->dev_list_node);
+ spin_unlock(&port->dev_list_lock);
+ kfree(dev); /* not kobject_register-ed yet */
port->port_dev = NULL;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cleanup after a discovery error
2006-10-19 3:19 [PATCH] cleanup after a discovery error malahal
@ 2006-10-19 19:08 ` James Bottomley
2006-10-30 20:23 ` malahal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2006-10-19 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: malahal; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 20:19 -0700, malahal@us.ibm.com wrote:
> Domain device is freed but the port dev list is not adjusted on some
> discovery errors. Module unload will Oops if this happens.
>
> Signed-off-by: Malahal Naineni <malahal@us.ibm.com>
>
> diff -r 4e1720b3c71b drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c Thu Oct 05 10:02:13 2006 -0700
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c Fri Oct 13 19:58:54 2006 -0700
> @@ -684,7 +684,23 @@ static void sas_discover_domain(void *da
> }
>
> if (error) {
> - kfree(port->port_dev); /* not kobject_register-ed yet */
> + struct domain_device *dev = port->port_dev;
> +
> + if (dev->rphy) {
> + sas_remove_children(&dev->rphy->dev);
> + sas_rphy_delete(dev->rphy);
> + dev->rphy = NULL;
> + }
> + if (dev->dev_type == EDGE_DEV || dev->dev_type == FANOUT_DEV) {
> + if (dev->ex_dev.ex_phy) {
> + kfree(dev->ex_dev.ex_phy);
> + dev->ex_dev.ex_phy = NULL;
> + }
> + }
> + spin_lock(&port->dev_list_lock);
> + list_del_init(&dev->dev_list_node);
> + spin_unlock(&port->dev_list_lock);
> + kfree(dev); /* not kobject_register-ed yet */
This is a bit of a layering violation
if the various discover functions are going to return an error, I think
it's their job to clean up whatever they did before returning.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cleanup after a discovery error
2006-10-19 19:08 ` James Bottomley
@ 2006-10-30 20:23 ` malahal
2006-11-07 20:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: malahal @ 2006-10-30 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi
James Bottomley [James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com] wrote:
>
> This is a bit of a layering violation
>
> if the various discover functions are going to return an error, I think
> it's their job to clean up whatever they did before returning.
>
> James
Hope this works better.
Signed-off-by: Malahal Naineni <malahal@us.ibm.com>
diff -r 80de69a94159 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c Wed Oct 25 13:28:31 2006 -0700
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c Mon Oct 30 11:55:21 2006 -0800
@@ -684,6 +684,11 @@ static void sas_discover_domain(void *da
}
if (error) {
+ sas_rphy_delete(port->port_dev->rphy);
+ port->port_dev->rphy = NULL;
+ spin_lock(&port->dev_list_lock);
+ list_del_init(&port->port_dev->dev_list_node);
+ spin_unlock(&port->dev_list_lock);
kfree(port->port_dev); /* not kobject_register-ed yet */
port->port_dev = NULL;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cleanup after a discovery error
2006-10-30 20:23 ` malahal
@ 2006-11-07 20:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2006-11-07 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley, linux-scsi
> James Bottomley [James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com] wrote:
>> This is a bit of a layering violation
>>
>> if the various discover functions are going to return an error, I think
>> it's their job to clean up whatever they did before returning.
Here's a reworked version of Malahal's patch that pushes the sas_rphy
cleanups into the sas_discover_{sas,sata,expander}.* functions. It also
checks the return value of sas_notify_lldd_dev_found(). This patch
(since it includes discovery error cleanup for SATA) is against
2.6.19-rc4 + scsi-misc + scsi-rc-fixes + aic94xx-sas, though I can
respin it without the SATA bits if desired.
--
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
index 23461dc..0f790ea 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
@@ -564,12 +564,25 @@ int sas_discover_sata(struct domain_devi
default:
break;
}
+ if (res)
+ goto out_err;
sas_notify_lldd_dev_gone(dev);
- if (!res) {
- sas_notify_lldd_dev_found(dev);
- res = sas_rphy_add(dev->rphy);
- }
+ res = sas_notify_lldd_dev_found(dev);
+ if (res)
+ goto out_err2;
+
+ res = sas_rphy_add(dev->rphy);
+ if (res)
+ goto out_err;
+
+ return res;
+
+out_err:
+ sas_notify_lldd_dev_gone(dev);
+out_err2:
+ sas_rphy_free(dev->rphy);
+ dev->rphy = NULL;
return res;
}
@@ -594,12 +607,20 @@ int sas_discover_end_dev(struct domain_d
/* do this to get the end device port attributes which will have
* been scanned in sas_rphy_add */
sas_notify_lldd_dev_gone(dev);
- sas_notify_lldd_dev_found(dev);
+ res = sas_notify_lldd_dev_found(dev);
+ if (res)
+ goto out_err2;
return 0;
out_err:
sas_notify_lldd_dev_gone(dev);
+ sas_rphy_free(dev->rphy);
+ dev->rphy = NULL;
+ return res;
+out_err2:
+ sas_rphy_delete(dev->rphy);
+ dev->rphy = NULL;
return res;
}
@@ -689,6 +710,10 @@ static void sas_discover_domain(void *da
}
if (error) {
+ spin_lock(&port->dev_list_lock);
+ list_del_init(&port->port_dev->dev_list_node);
+ spin_unlock(&port->dev_list_lock);
+
kfree(port->port_dev); /* not kobject_register-ed yet */
port->port_dev = NULL;
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index 4cc7457..a79e89c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -1474,14 +1474,27 @@ int sas_discover_root_expander(struct do
int res;
struct sas_expander_device *ex = rphy_to_expander_device(dev->rphy);
- sas_rphy_add(dev->rphy);
+ res = sas_rphy_add(dev->rphy);
+ if (res)
+ goto out_err;
ex->level = dev->port->disc.max_level; /* 0 */
res = sas_discover_expander(dev);
- if (!res)
- sas_ex_bfs_disc(dev->port);
+ if (res)
+ goto out_err2;
+
+ sas_ex_bfs_disc(dev->port);
return res;
+
+out_err2:
+ sas_rphy_delete(dev->rphy);
+ dev->rphy = NULL;
+ return res;
+out_err:
+ sas_rphy_free(dev->rphy);
+ dev->rphy = NULL;
+ return res;
}
/* ---------- Domain revalidation ---------- */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-07 20:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-19 3:19 [PATCH] cleanup after a discovery error malahal
2006-10-19 19:08 ` James Bottomley
2006-10-30 20:23 ` malahal
2006-11-07 20:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).