Jens Axboe wrote: > Hi Doug, > > resp_inquiry() does a GFP_KERNEL memory allocation, but it's not allowed > to from the queuecommand context. There's no good way to return this > error, so I used DID_ERROR which is used from similar paths. That > doesn't seem quite right though, it would be better to return an error > indicating a later retry would be more appropriate. > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c > index 30ee3d7..0c80ed3 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c > @@ -954,7 +954,9 @@ static int resp_inquiry(struct scsi_cmnd * scp, int target, > int alloc_len, n, ret; > > alloc_len = (cmd[3] << 8) + cmd[4]; > - arr = kzalloc(SDEBUG_MAX_INQ_ARR_SZ, GFP_KERNEL); > + arr = kzalloc(SDEBUG_MAX_INQ_ARR_SZ, GFP_ATOMIC); > + if (!arr) > + return DID_ERROR << 16; > if (devip->wlun) > pq_pdt = 0x1e; /* present, wlun */ > else if (scsi_debug_no_lun_0 && (0 == devip->lun)) > Jens, I had to read that twice. I'm always happy to convert a GFP_KERNEL to a GFP_ATOMIC (as I'm sure it started as a GFP_ATOMIC). There are a couple more that may be in queuecommand context. Taking up your point about retries and seeing that the scsi_debug driver has a SAS flavour, I'm inclined towards a "aborted command, initiator response timeout" [Bh,4Bh,6] CHECK CONDITION. There is a group of transport injected error messages in SAS (see sas2r07.pdf section 10.2.3) that pop up from time to time. Due to conjestion in connection-switched SAS expanders these error messages should be interpreted as "try again" depending on the topology. The patch below adds a "aborted_command" bit in opts that will cause every nth command to be aborted (with an ack/nak timeout). Note that SAS has an optional "transport layer retries" state machine to lessen the incidence of "aborted commands". Evidently SAS tape drives use the facility. Doug Gilbert