From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: "Dachepalli, Sudhir" <Sudhir.Dachepalli@lsi.com>,
Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in scsi_lib.c:scsi_req_map_sg()
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:21:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45EAF1F7.9040102@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1173023824.3372.53.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 09:43 -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
>> There are trying to do a scsi level multipath driver for RDAC support.
>> And they are trying to do something similar to request based multipath
>> (route requests instead of bios but in their case they are routing
>> scsi_cmnds instead of requests).
>
> I guessed it might be something like that ...
>
> The SCSI driver layer wasn't designed to stack like that ... hence the
> problems of setup and teardown of the sg list. Wouldn't it just be
> easier to make request based multi-path work? Unfortunately, you can't
> avoid the request system because what you want to do is resubmit an I/O
> without having the mid-layer execute the prepare function (which is
> where it's mapped) so you need the REQ_DONTPREP flag.
>
I think they get around this and other request settings that need
resetting by using scsi_execute_async. They will take the command, data
direction and buffer fields from the original scsi_cmnd, then pass those
on to scsi_ececute_async which would allocate a new request and then as
you know that new request gets sent to the scsi layer and looks like a
brand new request. So I misspoke above. It might be better to say they
are using it for routing what the other multipath layers would call
cloned commands.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-04 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-27 17:44 Possible bug in scsi_lib.c:scsi_req_map_sg() Boaz Harrosh
2006-11-27 19:13 ` Mike Christie
2006-11-27 19:27 ` Mike Christie
2006-11-27 21:52 ` Kai Makisara
2006-11-28 18:57 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-29 9:30 ` Benny Halevy
2007-03-02 16:45 ` Dachepalli, Sudhir
2007-03-02 21:19 ` Mike Christie
2007-03-02 21:59 ` Mike Christie
2007-03-02 23:45 ` Dachepalli, Sudhir
2007-03-04 0:04 ` Mike Christie
2007-03-04 7:36 ` Dachepalli, Sudhir
2007-03-04 14:31 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-04 15:43 ` Mike Christie
2007-03-04 15:57 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-04 16:21 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2007-03-04 16:51 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-04 17:04 ` Mike Christie
2007-03-04 17:07 ` Mike Christie
2007-03-04 18:00 ` Dachepalli, Sudhir
2007-03-04 18:14 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-04 19:06 ` Dachepalli, Sudhir
2007-03-05 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-05 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-27 23:33 ` James Bottomley
2006-11-28 15:44 ` Boaz Harrosh
2006-11-28 17:30 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45EAF1F7.9040102@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=Sudhir.Dachepalli@lsi.com \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox