From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: generating a Linux WWN? Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <460931.21951.qm@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <4702E3B7.9060403@garzik.org> Reply-To: ltuikov@yahoo.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.207.73]:35782 "HELO web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751299AbXJCDpv (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 23:45:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4702E3B7.9060403@garzik.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Michael Reed , James.Smart@Emulex.Com, linux-scsi --- Jeff Garzik wrote: > Luben Tuikov wrote: > > This still does not justify "let's generate it in the kernel". > > Once an admin specifies to use an alternate WWN provision, the method > used to obtain that WWN is an implementation detail and irrelevant. But you're arguing that the kernel should generate it to "help out" SAS drivers with HW that has had it's MS/NVRAM erased or corrupted. The kernel has no business generating SAS WWN. Luben