From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luben Tuikov Subject: Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:32:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <462600.51623.qm@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <47AC2FA7.7020700@vlnb.net> Reply-To: ltuikov@yahoo.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.207.73]:20878 "HELO web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751824AbYBIHc4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 02:32:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47AC2FA7.7020700@vlnb.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Cc: Bart Van Assche , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , James Bottomley , FUJITA Tomonori , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ming Zhang --- On Fri, 2/8/08, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > > Is there an open iSCSI Target implementation which > does NOT > > issue commands to sub-target devices via the SCSI > mid-layer, but > > bypasses it completely? > > What do you mean? To call directly low level backstorage > SCSI drivers > queuecommand() routine? What are advantages of it? Yes, that's what I meant. Just curious. Thanks, Luben