From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
To: Robert Jennings <rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
santil@us.ibm.com, stgt-devel@lists.berlios.de,
scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Stgt-devel] Question for pass-through target design
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:45:42 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46541B56.7000501@vlnb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070522195656.GD5758@austin.ibm.com>
Robert Jennings wrote:
>>>>What I meant that is that the kernel tgt code (scsi_tgt*) receives
>>>>SCSI commands from one lld and send them to another lld instead of
>>>>sending them to user space.
>>>
>>>Although the approach of passing SCSI commands from a target LLD to an
>>>initiator one without any significant interventions from the target
>>>software looks to be nice and simple, you should realize how limited,
>>>unsafe and illegal it is, since it badly violates SCSI specs.
>>
>>I think that 'implemented cleanly' means that one scsi_host is assigned
>>to only one initiator.
>
> Vladislav listed a number of issues that are inherent in an implementation
> that does not have a 1:1 relationship of initiators to targets. The vscsi
> architecture defines the 1:1 relationship; it's imposible to have more
> than one initiator per target.
Just few small notes:
1. As I already wrote, complete 1:1 relationship isn't practically
possible, because there is always a local access on the target (i.e. one
more initiator) and you can't disable it on practice.
2. 1:1 relationship is a serious limitation for usage cases like an SPI
tape library serving backup for several servers on an FC net.
Vlad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-23 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070504160712.GB16528@austin.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <200705041704.l44H4WXa003789@mbox.iij4u.or.jp>
[not found] ` <463B72F6.3000207@torque.net>
[not found] ` <20070506053629P.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2007-05-07 14:24 ` [Stgt-devel] Question for pass-through target design Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-05-07 15:10 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-05-07 15:27 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-05-07 15:37 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2007-05-07 16:52 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-05-08 5:51 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-05-22 19:56 ` Robert Jennings
2007-05-23 10:45 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin [this message]
2007-05-24 19:01 ` Robert Jennings
2007-05-25 14:38 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-01 15:12 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46541B56.7000501@vlnb.net \
--to=vst@vlnb.net \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=santil@us.ibm.com \
--cc=scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stgt-devel@lists.berlios.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).