From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [patch 14/25] SCSI: use irq_handler_t where appropriate Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 01:51:19 -0400 Message-ID: <465527D7.6030909@garzik.org> References: <200705232141.l4NLfjq9001203@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <4654BB27.6050706@garzik.org> <1179960902.5569.48.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:40882 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757213AbXEXFv0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 01:51:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1179960902.5569.48.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Salyzyn, Mark" , Andrew Vasquez James Bottomley wrote: > It's not a bug fix or even an enhancement. Historically, it is quite > difficult to get maintainers to ack these ... particularly if you don't > cc them. If neither you nor the maintainers are reading and responding to patches sent to linux-scsi, I don't think the problem is sitting in my chair. If others have SCSI patches that have been sitting in limbo for weeks or months, send them to me, and I'll queue them in misc-2.6.git#scsi. Jeff