From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] SCSI/initio conversion to PCI driver API Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 11:45:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4659A7A1.2070100@garzik.org> References: <20070527145200.GA17017@havoc.gtf.org> <20070527145955.GE17085@havoc.gtf.org> <46599DD9.4020408@garzik.org> <1180278739.3711.16.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:40249 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754723AbXE0Ppk (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 May 2007 11:45:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1180278739.3711.16.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Alan Cox James Bottomley wrote: > On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 11:03 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> Prior simplifications in this patchset now permit a minimal conversion >>> to the new PCI API. >>> >>> Further improvements and simplifications are certainly possible; those >>> should be presented in a separate patchset. >>> >>> DO NOT APPLY (yet). For feedback (and testers?) only. >> >> This only applies to patch #5. >> >> Patches 1 through 4 should go upstream, IMO. > > Erm, actually, you're treading all over Alan: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=72d39fea9017bbb1407620bf89dfe8d1fb658e35 > > Could you rebase your patches to scsi-misc-2.6 and resubmit (if there's > anything Alan hasn't covered)? Hey, if it's tested at least minimally that's the minimum I hoped to achieve. It sounds like you can drop all patches, though if it takes forever for scsi-misc-2.6 to go upstream, users in the interim will be denied the make-it-actually-work fix provided in patch #1, if that matters. Jeff