From: James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:56:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C038E3.5090204@emulex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708130021.07068.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
NACK
The fix is contained in our 8.2.2 sources recently posted and pushed by James
as part of his last scsi fixes.
-- james s
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> (previously send on 09-Aug-2007 20:47)
>
> Hi,
>
> The Coverity checker noticed that we may overrun a statically allocated
> array in drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c::lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find().
>
> The case is this; In 'struct lpfc_hba' we have
>
> #define LPFC_MAX_HBQS 4
> ...
> struct lpfc_hba {
> ...
> struct hbq_s hbqs[LPFC_MAX_HBQS];
> ...
> };
>
> But then in lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find() we have this code
>
> hbqno = tag >> 16;
> if (hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
> return NULL;
>
> if 'hbqno' ends up as exactely 4, then we won't return, and then this
>
> list_for_each_entry(d_buf, &phba->hbqs[hbqno].hbq_buffer_list, list) {
>
> will cause an overflow of the statically allocated array at index 4,
> since the valid indices are only 0-3.
>
> I propose this patch, that simply changes the 'hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS'
> into 'hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS' as a possible fix.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> index ce5ff2b..e5337ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t tag)
> uint32_t hbqno;
>
> hbqno = tag >> 16;
> - if (hbqno > LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
> + if (hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
> return NULL;
>
> list_for_each_entry(d_buf, &phba->hbqs[hbqno].hbq_buffer_list, list) {
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-13 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200708130016.11281.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
2007-08-12 22:21 ` [PATCH 4/6][RESEND] Emulex FC HBA driver: fix overflow of statically allocated array Jesper Juhl
2007-08-13 10:56 ` James Smart [this message]
2007-08-13 11:15 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-08-13 13:10 ` James Smart
2007-08-13 15:01 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C038E3.5090204@emulex.com \
--to=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox