From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.23-rc2 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:58:38 -0400 Message-ID: <46C07FAE.1040504@garzik.org> References: <1186248703.3439.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1186458941.6637.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070807001429.f8cb3b22.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1186496712.3414.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46B88B91.4050703@garzik.org> <1186501124.3414.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070807105144.0ba67d81.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070813124225.GT23758@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:58169 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S971344AbXHMP6u (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:58:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070813124225.GT23758@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Andrew Morton , James Bottomley , Linus Torvalds , linux-scsi , linux-kernel Jens Axboe wrote: > #for-akpm is usually only in very few -mm release anyway, so it's not > like it would have made much difference. We/you/I need to improve that, > certainly. > > Honestly, for bsg, it wasn't much of an issue. We had build problems > when bsg was merged which was unfortunate but got fixed quickly. Having > bsg in -mm would not have caused any testing of the driver in question > outside of what it already received, given the nature of it. That's just an excuse for what happened -- you made an end run around our test tree. Pretty please with sugar on it -- make sure changes show up in -mm. Jeff