public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
To: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] zfcp: zfcp: add statistics and other zfcp relatedinformation to sysfs
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:52:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E165B5.9060606@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709070915.33439.swen@vnet.ibm.com>

I am afraid this patch can't be applied as it is.

The problem is that the code doesn't take into account that older adapters do 
not provide the data which your patch tries to extract. There is a feature flag 
for that in the hardware specification. So the right response to Heiko's 
complaint about an unused feature flag wasn't to remove the flag definition... :-)

Is this patch against 2.6.23-rc or something? It doesn't apply without some 
minor noise. Besides there are some "HEAD"s below, which makes me think this is 
against some internal CVS revision...

For more nit-picking please see below.

Thanks,
Martin

Swen Schillig wrote:
> From: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> add statistics and other zfcp related information to sysfs
> 
> The zfcp adapter provides a variety of information which was never
> published to the external world. This patch adds a few of those "statistics"
> to the sysfs tree structure.
> 
> These are reflected in the following attributes
> 
> /sys/bus/ccw/drivers/zfcp/0.0.1707 
> /* information for the virtual adapter */
>         statistic_services/     
>                 requests        
>                 megabytes
>                 utilization
>                 seconds_active
> /* LUN specific info for channel- and fabric-latency */
>         0x500507630300c562/0x401040a600000000/  
>                 read_latency
>                 write_latency
>                 cmd_latency
> 
> Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/scsi/Makefile                |    2 
>  drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c              |   30 ++++-
>  drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h              |   14 ++
>  drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h              |    2 
>  drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c              |    1 
>  drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h              |   28 ++++-
>  drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c             |   39 +++++++
>  drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs_statistics.c |  162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs_unit.c       |   63 +++++++++++
>  9 files changed, 333 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
> ===================================================================
> --- HEAD.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
> +++ HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_def.h
> @@ -868,6 +868,17 @@ struct zfcp_erp_action {
>  	struct timer_list timer;
>  };
> 
> +struct latency_cont {
> +	u32 channel;
> +	u32 fabric;
> +	u32 counter;
> +};

Are you sure you want just 32 bits for sums? Given the unit used (hw ticks) it 
overruns quickly.

> +
> +struct zfcp_latencies {
> +	struct latency_cont read;
> +	struct latency_cont write;
> +	struct latency_cont cmd;
> +};
> 
>  struct zfcp_adapter {
>  	struct list_head	list;              /* list of adapters */
> @@ -883,6 +894,7 @@ struct zfcp_adapter {
>  	u32			adapter_features;  /* FCP channel features */
>  	u32			connection_features; /* host connection features */
>          u32			hardware_version;  /* of FCP channel */
> +	u16			timer_ticks;       /* time int for a tick */
>  	struct Scsi_Host	*scsi_host;	   /* Pointer to mid-layer */
>  	struct list_head	port_list_head;	   /* remote port list */
>  	struct list_head        port_remove_lh;    /* head of ports to be
> @@ -930,6 +942,7 @@ struct zfcp_adapter {
>  	struct zfcp_scsi_dbf_record	scsi_dbf_buf;
>  	struct zfcp_adapter_mempool	pool;      /* Adapter memory pools */
>  	struct qdio_initialize  qdio_init_data;    /* for qdio_establish */
> +	struct device		stat_services;

After my fancy, stat_services is not a good choice. Shorten it; statistics is 
descriptive enough.

In case you have been inspired by generic_services below: generic_services 
refers to Generic Services (GS) as defined by FC standard documents.

>  	struct device           generic_services;  /* directory for WKA ports */
>  	struct fc_host_statistics *fc_stats;
>  	struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_port *stats_reset_data;
> @@ -986,6 +999,7 @@ struct zfcp_unit {
>  						  all scsi_scan_target
>  						  requests have been
>  						  completed. */
> +	struct zfcp_latencies	latencies;
>  };
> 
>  /* FSF request */
> Index: HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- HEAD.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
> +++ HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
> @@ -2079,6 +2079,7 @@ zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_evaluate(struct
>  		fc_host_supported_classes(shost) =
>  				FC_COS_CLASS2 | FC_COS_CLASS3;
>  		adapter->hydra_version = bottom->adapter_type;
> +		adapter->timer_ticks = bottom->timer_interval;
>  		if (fc_host_permanent_port_name(shost) == -1)
>  			fc_host_permanent_port_name(shost) =
>  				fc_host_port_name(shost);
> Index: HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h
> ===================================================================
> --- HEAD.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h
> +++ HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.h
> @@ -322,11 +322,18 @@ struct fsf_link_down_info {
>  	u8 vendor_specific_code;
>  } __attribute__ ((packed));
> 
> +struct fsf_qual_latency_info {
> +	u32 channel_lat;
> +	u32 fabric_lat;
> +	u8 res1[8];
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> +
>  union fsf_prot_status_qual {
>  	u64 doubleword[FSF_PROT_STATUS_QUAL_SIZE / sizeof(u64)];
>  	struct fsf_qual_version_error   version_error;
>  	struct fsf_qual_sequence_error  sequence_error;
>  	struct fsf_link_down_info link_down_info;
> +	struct fsf_qual_latency_info latency_info;
>  } __attribute__ ((packed));
> 
>  struct fsf_qtcb_prefix {
> @@ -340,6 +347,15 @@ struct fsf_qtcb_prefix {
>  	u8  res1[20];
>  } __attribute__ ((packed));
> 
> +struct fsf_statistics_info {
> +	u64 input_req;
> +	u64 output_req;
> +	u64 control_req;
> +	u64 input_mb;
> +	u64 output_mb;
> +	u64 seconds_act;
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> +
>  union fsf_status_qual {
>  	u8  byte[FSF_STATUS_QUALIFIER_SIZE];
>  	u16 halfword[FSF_STATUS_QUALIFIER_SIZE / sizeof (u16)];
> @@ -427,7 +443,9 @@ struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_config {
>  	u32 fc_link_speed;
>  	u32 adapter_type;
>  	u32 peer_d_id;
> -	u8 res2[12];
> +	u8 res1[2];
> +	u16 timer_interval;
> +	u8 res2[8];
>  	u32 s_id;
>  	struct fsf_nport_serv_param nport_serv_param;
>  	u8 reserved_nport_serv_param[16];
> @@ -436,7 +454,8 @@ struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_config {
>  	u32 hardware_version;
>  	u8 serial_number[32];
>  	struct fsf_nport_serv_param plogi_payload;
> -	u8 res4[160];
> +	struct fsf_statistics_info stat_info;
> +	u8 res4[112];
>  } __attribute__ ((packed));
> 
>  struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_port {
> @@ -469,7 +488,10 @@ struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_port {
>  	u64 control_requests;
>  	u64 input_mb;		/* where 1 MByte == 1.000.000 Bytes */
>  	u64 output_mb;		/* where 1 MByte == 1.000.000 Bytes */
> -	u8 res2[256];
> +	u8 cp_util;
> +	u8 cb_util;
> +	u8 a_util;
> +	u8 res2[253];
>  } __attribute__ ((packed));
> 
>  union fsf_qtcb_bottom {
> Index: HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c
> ===================================================================
> --- HEAD.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c
> +++ HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_qdio.c
> @@ -232,6 +232,40 @@ zfcp_qdio_request_handler(struct ccw_dev
>  	return;
>  }
> 
> +static void zfcp_qdio_fsf_req_latency(struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req)
> +{
> +	struct fsf_qual_latency_info *lat_inf;
> +	struct zfcp_unit *unit;
> +
> +	lat_inf = &fsf_req->qtcb->prefix.prot_status_qual.latency_info;
> +	unit = fsf_req->unit;
> +
> +	switch (fsf_req->qtcb->bottom.io.data_direction) {
> +	case FSF_DATADIR_READ:
> +		unit->latencies.read.channel +=
> +				lat_inf->channel_lat;

Do you really need these line breaks?

> +		unit->latencies.read.fabric +=
> +				lat_inf->fabric_lat;
> +		unit->latencies.read.counter++;
> +		break;
> +	case FSF_DATADIR_WRITE:
> +		unit->latencies.write.channel +=
> +				lat_inf->channel_lat;
> +		unit->latencies.write.fabric +=
> +				lat_inf->fabric_lat;
> +		unit->latencies.write.counter++;
> +		break;
> +	case FSF_DATADIR_CMND:
> +		unit->latencies.cmd.channel +=
> +				lat_inf->channel_lat;
> +		unit->latencies.cmd.fabric +=
> +				lat_inf->fabric_lat;
> +		unit->latencies.cmd.counter++;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +
>  /**
>   * zfcp_qdio_reqid_check - checks for valid reqids.
>   */
> @@ -254,6 +288,11 @@ static void zfcp_qdio_reqid_check(struct
>  		panic("error: unknown request id (%ld) on adapter %s.\n",
>  		      req_id, zfcp_get_busid_by_adapter(adapter));
> 
> +	if ((fsf_req->fsf_command == FSF_QTCB_FCP_CMND) &&
> +	    (fsf_req->qtcb->prefix.prot_status &
> +	    (FSF_PROT_GOOD | FSF_PROT_FSF_STATUS_PRESENTED)))

According to hw specs. you need to check FSF_FCP_RSP_AVAILABLE as well.

Btw. this code only applies to FCP commands and should be moved to the 
corresponding handler function. You don't want to clutter this function with 
special case stuff.

> +		zfcp_qdio_fsf_req_latency(fsf_req);
> +
>  	zfcp_reqlist_remove(adapter, fsf_req);
>  	atomic_dec(&adapter->reqs_active);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
> Index: HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs_unit.c
> ===================================================================
> --- HEAD.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs_unit.c
> +++ HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs_unit.c
> @@ -125,6 +125,66 @@ zfcp_sysfs_unit_failed_show(struct devic
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(failed, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, zfcp_sysfs_unit_failed_show,
>  		   zfcp_sysfs_unit_failed_store);
> 
> +static ssize_t
> +zfcp_sysfs_unit_read_latency_show(struct device *dev,
> +				  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) {
> +	struct zfcp_unit *unit;
> +	struct zfcp_latencies *lat;
> +	struct zfcp_adapter *adapter;
> +
> +	unit = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	lat = &unit->latencies;
> +	adapter = unit->port->adapter;
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u %u %u\n",
> +			lat->read.fabric * adapter->timer_ticks / 1000,
> +			lat->read.channel * adapter->timer_ticks / 1000,
> +			lat->read.counter);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(read_latency, S_IRUGO, zfcp_sysfs_unit_read_latency_show,
> +		   NULL);
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +zfcp_sysfs_unit_write_latency_show(struct device *dev,
> +				   struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) {
> +	struct zfcp_unit *unit;
> +	struct zfcp_latencies *lat;
> +	struct zfcp_adapter *adapter;
> +
> +	unit = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	lat = &unit->latencies;
> +	adapter = unit->port->adapter;
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u %u %u\n",
> +		       lat->write.fabric * adapter->timer_ticks / 1000,
> +		       lat->write.channel * adapter->timer_ticks / 1000,
> +		       lat->write.counter);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(write_latency, S_IRUGO, zfcp_sysfs_unit_write_latency_show,
> +		   NULL);
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +zfcp_sysfs_unit_cmd_latency_show(struct device *dev,
> +				 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) {
> +	struct zfcp_unit *unit;
> +	struct zfcp_latencies *lat;
> +	struct zfcp_adapter *adapter;
> +
> +	unit = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	lat = &unit->latencies;
> +	adapter = unit->port->adapter;
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u %u %u\n",
> +		       lat->cmd.fabric * adapter->timer_ticks / 1000,
> +		       lat->cmd.channel * adapter->timer_ticks / 1000,
> +		       lat->cmd.counter);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(cmd_latency, S_IRUGO, zfcp_sysfs_unit_cmd_latency_show,
> +		   NULL);
> +
>  static struct attribute *zfcp_unit_attrs[] = {
>  	&dev_attr_failed.attr,
>  	&dev_attr_in_recovery.attr,
> @@ -132,6 +192,9 @@ static struct attribute *zfcp_unit_attrs
>  	&dev_attr_access_denied.attr,
>  	&dev_attr_access_shared.attr,
>  	&dev_attr_access_readonly.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_read_latency.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_write_latency.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_cmd_latency.attr,
>  	NULL
>  };
> 
> Index: HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
> ===================================================================
> --- HEAD.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
> +++ HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_ext.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ extern int  zfcp_sysfs_unit_create_files
>  extern void zfcp_sysfs_unit_remove_files(struct device *);
>  extern void zfcp_sysfs_port_release(struct device *);
>  extern void zfcp_sysfs_unit_release(struct device *);
> +extern int  zfcp_sysfs_statistic_services_create_files(struct device *);
> +extern void zfcp_sysfs_statistic_services_remove_files(struct device *);
> 
>  /**************************** CONFIGURATION  *********************************/
>  extern struct zfcp_unit *zfcp_get_unit_by_lun(struct zfcp_port *, fcp_lun_t);
> Index: HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
> ===================================================================
> --- HEAD.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
> +++ HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c
> @@ -1067,13 +1067,32 @@ zfcp_adapter_enqueue(struct ccw_device *
>  	if (zfcp_sysfs_adapter_create_files(&ccw_device->dev))
>  		goto sysfs_failed;
> 
> +	adapter->stat_services.parent = &adapter->ccw_device->dev;
> +	adapter->stat_services.release = zfcp_dummy_release;
> +	snprintf(adapter->stat_services.bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE,
> +		 "statistic_services");

please shorten statistic_services

> +	dev_set_drvdata(&adapter->stat_services, adapter);
> +
> +	if (device_register(&adapter->stat_services))
> +		goto services_failed;
> +
> +	if (zfcp_sysfs_statistic_services_create_files(&adapter->stat_services))
> +	{
> +		device_unregister(&adapter->stat_services);

Please move this unregister stuff down to a proper label and just jump there 
immediately. This admittedly long function used to get by on this method just fine.

> +		goto services_failed;
> +	}
> +
>  	adapter->generic_services.parent = &adapter->ccw_device->dev;
>  	adapter->generic_services.release = zfcp_dummy_release;
>  	snprintf(adapter->generic_services.bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE,
>  		 "generic_services");
> 
> -	if (device_register(&adapter->generic_services))
> -		goto generic_services_failed;
> +	if (device_register(&adapter->generic_services)) {
> +		zfcp_sysfs_statistic_services_remove_files(&adapter->

Please don't do a line break within a function call argument like this.
What about shorter function names?

> +							   stat_services);
> +		device_unregister(&adapter->stat_services);

No, please stuff all the undo-stuff at the end of the function.

> +		goto services_failed;

You probably want a seperate label for this goto.

> +	}
> 
>  	/* put allocated adapter at list tail */
>  	write_lock_irq(&zfcp_data.config_lock);
> @@ -1085,7 +1104,7 @@ zfcp_adapter_enqueue(struct ccw_device *
> 
>  	goto out;
> 
> - generic_services_failed:
> + services_failed:

I disagree about aggregating these cases.

>  	zfcp_sysfs_adapter_remove_files(&adapter->ccw_device->dev);
>   sysfs_failed:
>  	zfcp_adapter_debug_unregister(adapter);
> @@ -1118,9 +1137,11 @@ zfcp_adapter_dequeue(struct zfcp_adapter
>  	int retval = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> 
> -	zfcp_adapter_scsi_unregister(adapter);

Oh, moving this line is a functional change (or fix?) unrelated to the 
functionality you are adding, isn't it?

If this change is intentional, it should go into a separate (bug fix) patch.

>  	device_unregister(&adapter->generic_services);
> +	zfcp_sysfs_statistic_services_remove_files(&adapter->stat_services);
> +	device_unregister(&adapter->stat_services);
>  	zfcp_sysfs_adapter_remove_files(&adapter->ccw_device->dev);
> +	zfcp_adapter_scsi_unregister(adapter);
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&adapter->ccw_device->dev, NULL);
>  	/* sanity check: no pending FSF requests */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->req_list_lock, flags);
> @@ -1264,6 +1285,7 @@ zfcp_port_enqueue(struct zfcp_adapter *a
> 
>  	if (zfcp_sysfs_port_create_files(&port->sysfs_device, status)) {
>  		device_unregister(&port->sysfs_device);
> +		kfree(port);

Scratching my head... another unrelated change (looks like a fix for a real 
memory leak)?

>  		return NULL;
>  	}
> 
> Index: HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- HEAD.orig/drivers/s390/scsi/Makefile
> +++ HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/Makefile
> @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@
> 
>  zfcp-objs := zfcp_aux.o zfcp_ccw.o zfcp_scsi.o zfcp_erp.o zfcp_qdio.o \
>  	     zfcp_fsf.o zfcp_dbf.o zfcp_sysfs_adapter.o zfcp_sysfs_port.o \
> -	     zfcp_sysfs_unit.o zfcp_sysfs_driver.o
> +	     zfcp_sysfs_unit.o zfcp_sysfs_driver.o zfcp_sysfs_statistics.o
> 
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ZFCP) += zfcp.o
> Index: HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs_statistics.c
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null
> +++ HEAD/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs_statistics.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
> +/*
> + * This file is part of the zfcp device driver for
> + * FCP adapters for IBM System z9 and zSeries.
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2007
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
> + * any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
> + */
> +
> +#include "zfcp_ext.h"
> +
> +#define ZFCP_LOG_AREA                   ZFCP_LOG_AREA_CONFIG
> +
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +zfcp_sysfs_adapter_utilization_show(struct device *dev,
> +				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct zfcp_adapter *adapter;
> +	struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_port *qtcb_port;
> +	int retval;
> +
> +	adapter = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	qtcb_port = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_port), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!qtcb_port)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	retval = zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_sync(adapter, qtcb_port);
> +	if (!retval)
> +		retval = sprintf(buf, "%u %u %u\n", qtcb_port->cp_util,
> +				 qtcb_port->cb_util, qtcb_port->a_util);
> +	kfree(qtcb_port);
> +	return retval;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(utilization, S_IRUGO, zfcp_sysfs_adapter_utilization_show,
> +		   NULL);
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +zfcp_sysfs_adapter_request_show(struct device *dev,
> +				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct zfcp_adapter *adapter;
> +	struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_config *qtcb_config;
> +	int retval;
> +
> +	adapter = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	qtcb_config = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_config),
> +			      GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!qtcb_config)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	retval = zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_sync(adapter, qtcb_config);
> +	if (!retval)
> +		retval = sprintf(buf, "%lu %lu %lu\n",
> +				 qtcb_config->stat_info.input_req,
> +				 qtcb_config->stat_info.output_req,
> +				 qtcb_config->stat_info.control_req);
> +
> +	kfree(qtcb_config);
> +	return retval;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(requests, S_IRUGO, zfcp_sysfs_adapter_request_show, NULL);
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +zfcp_sysfs_adapter_mb_show(struct device *dev,
> +			   struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct zfcp_adapter *adapter;
> +	struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_config *qtcb_config;
> +	int retval;
> +
> +	adapter = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	qtcb_config = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_config),
> +			      GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	if (!qtcb_config)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	retval = zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_sync(adapter, qtcb_config);
> +	if (!retval)
> +		retval = sprintf(buf, "%lu %lu\n",
> +				 qtcb_config->stat_info.input_mb,
> +				 qtcb_config->stat_info.output_mb);
> +
> +	kfree(qtcb_config);
> +	return retval;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(megabytes, S_IRUGO, zfcp_sysfs_adapter_mb_show, NULL);
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +zfcp_sysfs_adapter_seconds_active_show(struct device *dev,
> +				       struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				       char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct zfcp_adapter *adapter;
> +	struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_config *qtcb_config;
> +	int retval;
> +
> +	adapter = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	qtcb_config = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fsf_qtcb_bottom_config),
> +			      GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	if (!qtcb_config)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	retval = zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data_sync(adapter, qtcb_config);
> +	if (!retval)
> +		retval = sprintf(buf, "%lu\n",
> +				 qtcb_config->stat_info.seconds_act);
> +
> +	kfree(qtcb_config);
> +	return retval;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(seconds_active, S_IRUGO,
> +		   zfcp_sysfs_adapter_seconds_active_show, NULL);
> +
> +static struct attribute *zfcp_statistic_services_attrs[] = {
> +	&dev_attr_utilization.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_requests.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_megabytes.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_seconds_active.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group zfcp_statistic_services_attr_group = {
> +	.attrs = zfcp_statistic_services_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +int
> +zfcp_sysfs_statistic_services_create_files(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj,
> +				  &zfcp_statistic_services_attr_group);
> +}
> +
> +void
> +zfcp_sysfs_statistic_services_remove_files(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &zfcp_statistic_services_attr_group);
> +}
> +
> +#undef ZFCP_LOG_AREA
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-07 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-07  7:15 [PATCH 2/2] zfcp: zfcp: add statistics and other zfcp relatedinformation to sysfs Swen Schillig
2007-09-07 14:52 ` Martin Peschke [this message]
2007-09-08 11:54   ` Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46E165B5.9060606@de.ibm.com \
    --to=mp3@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swen@vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox