From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [patchset 0/24] Lots of the Accessors patches and !use_sg cleanup Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:57:36 -0400 Message-ID: <46EEEA40.40908@garzik.org> References: <46E6F92D.2090409@panasas.com> <200709171246.15142.bzolnier@gmail.com> <1190037090.3386.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200709172205.36070.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:39422 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755184AbXIQU7r (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:59:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200709172205.36070.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: James Bottomley , Boaz Harrosh , FUJITA Tomonori , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , Matthew Dharm , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , YOKOTA Hiroshi , linux-scsi , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Mark Fortescue , osst@riede.org Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2007, James Bottomley wrote: >> Realistically (and I hate myself for saying this) libata-pata does >> provide a much better alternative for the ATAPI devices. Is it just >> time to recognise the inevitable and kill ide-scsi? > > Agreed, libata-pata is a much better version of ide-scsi. ;-) > > If there is general consensus about ide-scsi removal I think that we > should start with disabling ide-scsi Kconfig entry in 2.6.24 to later > remove the ide-scsi driver completely in 2.6.25. Perhaps it is strange to hear me say this, but... My experience with the IDE driver in the field is that ide-scsi sees a fair amount of use, as an intentional replacement for ide-cd and the other hand-written ide-$class ATAPI drivers. I would prefer that ide-scsi stays around as long as ide stays around. Jeff