public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Matthew Jacob <lydianconcepts@gmail.com>
Cc: ltuikov@yahoo.com, Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>,
	James.Smart@emulex.com, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: generating a Linux WWN?
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:09:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4703DADF.70509@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7579f7fb0710031102q34f9d02dp1c1077758dbe7982@mail.gmail.com>

Matthew Jacob wrote:
>> The generation algorithm is whatever makes people happy.  I would
>> probably pick a fixed prefix like 0x6C 0x69 0x63 ("lin"), something that
>> doesn't conflict with IEEE org ids for a long time to come.  Then,
>> get_random_bytes() or hash some useful machine characteristics for the
>> rest of the bytes.
> 
> The "probably" here is kind of amusing.
> 
> Look, Linux development has the moolah (look at all the money IBM and
> SGI and others have shoveled in)- why don't you get a Linux block of
> OUIs from the IEEE and set up an RSS-like feed so the Open Source
> community can get WWNs with that OUI and a incrementing serial number
> as needed- that would be a *real* service. I've thought about doing
> this, but I'd have to fork over at least 1700$USD to get an official
> IEEE OUI and over the last ten years I've already spent far too much
> of my own money on open source support.
> 
> Heck, maybe even the IEEE would comp you on OUIs.

Certainly, I would love for this to happen!  Although my employer (Red 
Hat), SGI, IBM or whomever might be willing to tackle this, it might be 
more appropriate for the Linux Foundation.

Anybody wanna volunteer to pursue this?

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-03 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-27 10:04 generating a Linux WWN? Jeff Garzik
2007-09-27 13:55 ` Michael Reed
2007-09-27 14:04 ` James Smart
2007-09-27 14:16   ` Patrick_Boyd
2007-09-27 14:46     ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-09-27 15:07       ` Michael Reed
2007-09-27 15:12         ` Michael Reed
2007-09-27 23:40         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-27 22:48       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-01 10:56         ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-27 14:19   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-27 14:29     ` Michael Reed
2007-09-27 15:30       ` Douglas Gilbert
2007-09-27 22:32         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-27 23:12       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-02 23:47         ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-03  0:35           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03  3:45             ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-03  4:15               ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03  5:12                 ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-03  5:25                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03  5:31                     ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-03  5:45                       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03 14:59                         ` Douglas Gilbert
2007-10-03 16:16                           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03 18:02                         ` Matthew Jacob
2007-10-03 18:09                           ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-10-03 19:44                             ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-03 20:25                               ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03 22:08                                 ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-03 22:17                                   ` David Miller
2007-10-04  0:11                                     ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-04  3:23                                       ` Matthew Jacob
2007-10-04  3:27                                         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-04  3:33                                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-10-05 22:09                                     ` James Bottomley
2007-10-05 22:11                                       ` David Miller
2007-10-05 22:14                                         ` James Bottomley
2007-10-05 22:17                                           ` David Miller
2007-10-05 22:41                                             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-05 22:49                                               ` David Miller
2007-10-05 22:52                                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-06 14:11                                             ` James Bottomley
2007-10-06 14:36                                               ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-06 15:04                                                 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-06 15:23                                                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-06 15:33                                                     ` James Bottomley
2007-10-06 15:42                                                       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-08 18:42                                                     ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-07  2:48                                                   ` David Miller
2007-10-08 15:41                                                     ` Michael Reed
2007-10-08 18:34                                                 ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-07  2:46                                               ` David Miller
2007-10-08 18:18                                       ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-03  5:38                     ` Luben Tuikov
2007-10-03  5:47                       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-03 15:33                         ` Michael Reed
2007-10-03 16:02                           ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4703DADF.70509@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=James.Smart@emulex.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
    --cc=lydianconcepts@gmail.com \
    --cc=mdr@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox