From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: generating a Linux WWN? Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:41:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4706BDA4.7090106@garzik.org> References: <1191622146.3475.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071005.151131.125883267.davem@davemloft.net> <1191622488.3475.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20071005.151711.112302061.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:53171 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761378AbXJEWlw (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:41:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071005.151711.112302061.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, ltuikov@yahoo.com, lydianconcepts@gmail.com, mdr@sgi.com, James.Smart@emulex.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > I think providing both possibilities (kernel auto-generated and user > specified) is appropriate. And that's been my plan from day one... which is remarkably a lot like the behavior of several net drivers. :) * attempt to read WWN during module load * admin may optionally choose to manually specify OR auto-generate a WWN * fail, if no WWN [stating the obvious] Regards, Jeff