From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Lin Ming <minggr@gmail.com>,
Jeff Wu <jeff.wu@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] scsi: pm: use autosuspend if device supports it
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:01:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4732005.Un0exgRK6O@linux-lqwf.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120726124326.GA2022@localhost.localdomain>
On Thursday 26 July 2012 20:43:32 Aaron Lu wrote:
> > What is the purpose of this approach?
>
> The purpose is to let scsi layer driver(sd, sr, etc.) use the same pm
> api(scsi_autopm_put_device) to put the device to runtime suspended
> state.
> When the device is ready to be suspended, if it does not make use of
> autosuspend, call pm_runtime_put_sync for it; if it makes use of
> autosuspend, call the autosuspend runtime pm apis for it.
>
> > You need a very good reason to have an API do two different things
> > based on this.
>
> If you see the above reason not good, I'll prepare an updated version
> to create a new api to cover the autosuspend case, something like:
> void scsi_autopm_put_device_autosuspend(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> {
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
> }
> Does this look right?
Much better :-)
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-26 10:05 [PATCH v3 0/7] ZPODD patches for scsi tree Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] scsi: sr: check support for device busy class events Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] scsi: pm: use autosuspend if device supports it Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-07-26 12:43 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 13:01 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] scsi: sr: support zero power ODD(ZPODD) Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] scsi: sr: block events when runtime suspended Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] scsi: pm: use runtime resume callback if available Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] scsi: sr: balance sr disk events block depth Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:54 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-07-26 12:47 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] block: genhd: add an interface to set disk's poll interval Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 13:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] ZPODD patches for scsi tree Jeff Garzik
2012-07-26 14:41 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 18:04 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4732005.Un0exgRK6O@linux-lqwf.site \
--to=oneukum@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@amd.com \
--cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff.wu@amd.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minggr@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).