From: Tore Anderson <tore@linpro.no>
To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com
Cc: Linux SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
MLOEHR@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Disabling dev_loss_tmo?
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:38:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <473B1692.8050606@linpro.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <473B0644.3090403@emulex.com>
* James Smart
> Please don't shoot the messenger. I was trying to summarize the
> evolution of FC into the kernel, highlight that the DM team knew of
> the issue, had higher-priority issues, and that it applies to more
> than FC. Having experienced first-hand this method of getting work
> done, I certainly don't promote it as a productive way of doing
> things.
Sorry, didn't mean to shoot you! ;-) I mean "you" in the plural sense;
«you SCSI people» - got the impression there is some kind of disdain
towards the DM team (which would indeed be a counter-productive way of
getting things done). Not my intention to offend anyone, and if I did
anyway I apologise.
It's just frusterating when things don't work...
> I'm highlighting that - ok today, we get FC working, but then the
> user puts DM on something else, like iSCSI or SAS/whatever, then it
> too breaks - and that's ok ?
Of course the best would be if it worked perfectly with all transports,
and leaving things broken is of course not OK. In my strictly pragmatic
opinion, though, having a functional DM+FC combo and and half-functional
DM+<anything else> combos is better than having _only_ half-functional
combos.
> Using this analogy, to resolve the reuse-after-free issues, we simply
> would have used the dont-tear-down patches to avoid teardown bugs,
> like what the distros did. This too is a bad approach. Things need
> to get fixed where things need to get fixed. We can add the FC
> patch, but DM still needs to get fixed.
Best would to have DM-multipath handle the disconnects gracefully, of
course. But since it doesn't appear to be happening anytime soon: A
workaround provided by the transport layer would be very welcome! I
don't use iSCSI or SAS with DM so I don't know if such a workaround is
wanted there too, but with FC it is necessary. Even if it is a bad
approach it is much better than nothing, the way I see it.
Regards
--
Tore Anderson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-13 9:11 Disabling dev_loss_tmo? Tore Anderson
2007-11-13 10:24 ` Michael Loehr
2007-11-13 11:07 ` Tore Anderson
2007-11-13 16:18 ` James Smart
2007-11-14 8:10 ` Tore Anderson
2007-11-14 14:29 ` James Smart
2007-11-14 15:38 ` Tore Anderson [this message]
2007-11-14 19:00 ` James Smart
2007-11-15 8:02 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=473B1692.8050606@linpro.no \
--to=tore@linpro.no \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=MLOEHR@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdr@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox