From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scsi: Drivers not ready for sg-chaining
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:08:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47AF2188.2030400@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202658166.3136.44.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, Feb 10 2008 at 17:42 +0200, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 18:51 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> All below drivers are not sg-chain ready do to incomplete software.
>> Once fixed they can move back to SG_ALL. For now they are stuck on
>> SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS.
>>
>> Affected drivers/files:
>> drivers/scsi/aha152x.c
>
> This seems to process an element at a time and should be fixed by
> sg_next()
>
>> drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.[ch]
>
> As does this.
>
>> drivers/scsi/imm.c
>
> And this.
>
>> drivers/scsi/in2000.h
>
> And this (.c not .h)
>
>> drivers/scsi/pcmcia/nsp_cs.c
>
> This uses a software table, so should be fine.
>
>> drivers/scsi/ppa.c
>
> This does element at a time, so should be fixed by sg_next()
>
>> drivers/scsi/tmscsim.c
>
> as does this.
>
> Given where we are in the cycle, it's probably best just to set SG_ALL
> to 128 so there's no possibility of problems. Individual drivers can
> make the tradeoff on how they handle larger lists going beyond this.
>
> James
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> index d1299e9..530ff4c 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <scsi/scsi.h>
>
> struct request_queue;
> struct block_device;
> @@ -25,12 +26,15 @@ struct blk_queue_tags;
> * NONE: Self evident. Host adapter is not capable of scatter-gather.
> * ALL: Means that the host adapter module can do scatter-gather,
> * and that there is no limit to the size of the table to which
> - * we scatter/gather data.
> + * we scatter/gather data. The value we set here is the maximum
> + * single element sglist. To use chained sglists, the adapter
> + * has to set a value beyond ALL (and correctly use the chain
> + * handling API.
> * Anything else: Indicates the maximum number of chains that can be
> * used in one scatter-gather request.
> */
> #define SG_NONE 0
> -#define SG_ALL 0xff
> +#define SG_ALL SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS
>
> #define MODE_UNKNOWN 0x00
> #define MODE_INITIATOR 0x01
>
>
> James
>
>
My patches *do not* attempt to fix the sg_chaining support. They only
make all the drivers that use SG_ALL to use SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS.
One by One, and not globally as your suggestion.
This is for two reasons.
1. So drivers can be individually fixed and in the patch that fixes them
they can go back to SG_ALL.
2. Those drivers that have been using SG_ALL correctly and were converted
to support sg-chaining are not penalized because of bad/old drivers
3. Some drivers in this patchset are converted to use a real internal
driver limit. That does not necessarily match SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS.
In the event that SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS wants to change.
The bulk of the patchset is very much mechanical and is not dangerous
and was ACKed by the more important maintainers. (That is where the
changes are more then trivial). So I don't see why they cannot get
a proper review and be accepted. Instead of doing the safe but the
wrong thing, cross tree.
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-10 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-17 16:37 [patch 0/8] Change SG_ALL to mean "any size" Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/8] firewire: ieee1394: Move away from SG_ALL Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 17:51 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-19 7:59 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-19 15:01 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-19 15:16 ` Stefan Richter
2008-01-17 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/8] scsi-drivers Don't use SG_ALL as allocation size Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 17:47 ` Andrew Vasquez
2008-01-17 18:11 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 18:30 ` Andrew Vasquez
2008-01-17 18:57 ` [PATCH 2/8 ver2] " Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 16:46 ` [PATCH 3/8] NCR5380: Not sg-chain ready Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 16:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] wd33c93: " Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 16:49 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm/scsi: " Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 16:51 ` scsi: Drivers not ready for sg-chaining Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 15:42 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-10 16:08 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2008-02-10 16:16 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-10 16:36 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-02-10 16:53 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-17 16:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] a100u2w: advansys: initio: Wrong use of SG_ALL Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 16:55 ` [PATCH 8/8] Change SG_ALL to mean "any size" Boaz Harrosh
2008-01-17 17:53 ` [patch 0/8] " Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47AF2188.2030400@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).