From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Hounschell Subject: Re: New 2.6.24.2 SG_IO SCSI problems Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:16:33 -0500 Message-ID: <47C00091.8000404@cfl.rr.com> References: <47BD9588.9080803@compro.net> <47BEFD4B.9060803@cs.wisc.edu> <47BEFF5F.9020002@cs.wisc.edu> <47BF0CE2.306@compro.net> <47BF40D7.5050301@compro.net> <47BF4BD0.7080008@cs.wisc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:64267 "EHLO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752722AbYBWLVI (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:21:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47BF4BD0.7080008@cs.wisc.edu> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Christie Cc: markh@compro.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Battersby Mike Christie wrote: > Mark Hounschell wrote: >> Mark Hounschell wrote: >>> Mike Christie wrote: >>>> Mike Christie wrote: >>>>> Mark Hounschell wrote: >>>>>> I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO >>>>>> interface of 2.6.24.2. I have an application that up until 2.6.24 >>>>>> worked fine. The 2.6.23.16 kernel works fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> During reads I get these kernel messages. Writes and other functions >>>>>> _seem_ OK. Actually basic >>>>>> reads are working. Its with large BC reads using an io_vec list that >>>>>> the problem shows up. >>>>>> >>>>> Are you doing SG_IO to the sg device (/dev/sg*) or to the block device >>>>> (/dev/sdX)? >>>> If you are doing SG_IO to the sg device, then I know of one regression >>>> (well not regression exactly, but I fixed a bug but the patch got >>>> partially overwritten by another patch and that caused a new bug). Both >>>> bugs are fixed in 2.6.25-rc2. Could you try that out if you are doing >>>> SG_IO to the sg device. >>>> >>> Yes, I'm using /dev/sg*. And yes again I'll checkout 2.6.25-rc2 ASIC. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Mark >>> - >> >> 2.6.25-rc2 does fix the problem I'm having. I don't suppose there is a >> patch >> lying around for 2.6.24.2?? >> > > I attached a backport of the patch from Tony (added as cc) that is in > 2.6.25-rc2. Could you try it out against 2.6.24.2 just to make sure it > was this patch, then we can send it to stable. > Sorry it took so long. This does fix my problem. I hope it's not to late for 2.6.24.3 Regards Mark