From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Richter Subject: Re: [patch] convert the scsi layer to use struct device Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:38:27 +0100 Message-ID: <47DC33C3.8060205@s5r6.in-berlin.de> References: <20080313210655.GA13468@kroah.com> <1205514958.2904.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1205529619.2904.87.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1205531922.3522.57.camel@lov.site> <1205590788.6767.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1205594256.3109.53.camel@lov.site> <1205597776.6767.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1205604100.6767.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1205605604.3109.148.camel@lov.site> <1205606060.6767.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:43324 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752315AbYCOUio (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:38:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1205606060.6767.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Kay Sievers , Greg KH , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Tony Jones James Bottomley wrote: > If the backlink were called "enclosure_component", that would probably > be fine. Not sure I have a better name than "device" for the actual > device in the enclosure slot, though. enclosed_device or enclosed/ if it is a 1:n relationship -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- --== -==== http://arcgraph.de/sr/