From: "Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]" <r.bhatia@ipax.at>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Add more debug output to sas_scsi_recover_host or sas_eh_handle_sas_errors
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:16:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FA3ABA.7080306@ipax.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1207578974.3838.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hello james,
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:22 +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
>> is there any sens in adding more debug output to sas_scsi_recover_host
>> or sas_eh_handle_sas_errors?
>>
>> e.g. put out SAS_ADDR(task->dev->sas_addr) so that we know whether
>> the error is always occuring on one phy/port/etc. ?
>>
>> the reason for doing this is basically my problems with the aic94xx
>> driver, outlined in http://marc.info/?t=120603924200004.
>
> Probably not really ... it looks like a standard protocol error thrown
> by a Seagate driver, as I said.
the only information from seagate was: you have the latest firmware,
please verify with a different controller.
unfortunatly, until now i haven't been able to test with another disk
and/or controller.
> Did reducing the queue depth and increasing the retries have any
> mitigating effect at all?
mhm, i cannot say for sure as i played a lot with different sequencer
version (which i directly got from adaptec). but as far as i can tell
it did not have a big impact and the errors usually start to appear
within 3-6 minutes.
during my last test (second test with kernel 2.6.20-rc8, default queue
depth) it took 22 minutes, but this happens very seldom.
> The correct fix, which is to handle the REQ_TASK_ABORT on the fly is
> still in the works.
ok, do you have any eta for this? what about luben's comment in the
previous thread?
someone from adaptec took a look into this issue. i am currently asking
whether i am allowed forward the conversation to you (or any other
kernel developer who is interested).
the discussion was basically about a pci-bus vs sas-bus (realtime-bus)
issue.
cheers,
raoul
- --
____________________________________________________________________
DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. r.bhatia@ipax.at
Technischer Leiter
IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OEG web. http://www.ipax.at
Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. office@ipax.at
1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030
FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15
____________________________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFH+jq6EaTXmVQ/cvsRAnKUAJ9ONuV1Lak/fERAUKhg5fthiAOZ3gCfWsnN
huvPOsvdov+zKVTyj5jj7pc=
=l6F2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-07 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-07 14:22 Add more debug output to sas_scsi_recover_host or sas_eh_handle_sas_errors Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
2008-04-07 14:36 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-07 15:16 ` Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FA3ABA.7080306@ipax.at \
--to=r.bhatia@ipax.at \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).