From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Smart Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iscsi_tcp: Enable large commands Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:08:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4804A8C7.504@emulex.com> References: <20080414010112W.tomof@acm.org> <1208170266-1676-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <48049E8A.7030700@panasas.com> <4804A16D.7000002@panasas.com> Reply-To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from emulex.emulex.com ([138.239.112.1]:44895 "EHLO emulex.emulex.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752480AbYDONLg (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:11:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4804A16D.7000002@panasas.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , James Bottomley , Mike Christie , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Alasdair G Kergon , Geert Uytterhoeven Boaz Harrosh wrote: > Let through up to the largest command of 260 defined by the scsi standard. > iscsi core supports this already. Now that the scsi-ml supports it we can > start using large commands. Just to double-check: if we use sg_io to pass through requests from user-land, which are addressed to drivers or transports, and which may not be a SCSI command but rather just something utilizing the sg_io infrastructure for management or pass-thru, are we limited to 260 bytes for request/cmd payload ? -- james s