linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] block: add large command support
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:08:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4805C209.6040606@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080416083305.GY12774@kernel.dk>

On Wed, Apr 16 2008 at 11:33 +0300, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:50:54 +0200
>> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Monday 14 April 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 14 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>>>> This patch changes rq->cmd from the static array to a pointer to
>>>>> support large commands.
>>>>>
>>>>> We rarely handle large commands. So for optimization, a struct request
>>>>> still has a static array for a command. rq_init sets rq->cmd pointer
>>>>> to the static array.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>>>>> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  block/blk-core.c       |    1 +
>>>>>  drivers/ide/ide-io.c   |    1 +
>>>>>  include/linux/blkdev.h |   12 ++++++++++--
>>>>>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>>>>> index 6669238..6f0968f 100644
>>>>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>>>>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>>>>> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>>>>>  	rq->errors = 0;
>>>>>  	rq->ref_count = 1;
>>>>>  	rq->cmd_len = 0;
>>>>> +	rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
>>>>>  	memset(rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB);
>>>>>  	rq->data_len = 0;
>>>>>  	rq->extra_len = 0;
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>>>>> index 7153796..bac5ea1 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>>>>> @@ -1595,6 +1595,7 @@ void ide_init_drive_cmd (struct request *rq)
>>>>>  {
>>>>>  	memset(rq, 0, sizeof(*rq));
>>>>>  	rq->ref_count = 1;
>>>>> +	rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
>>>>>  }
>>> Tomo, some more changes are needed:
>>>
>>> Please think about all _static_/dynamic allocations of 'struct request'
>>> used together with REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL etc., i.e.
>> I think that using struct request allocated statically is wrong from
>> the perspective of the block layer design, that is, you always need to
>> use blk_get_request. I think that except ide, everyone does.
>>
>> I try to convert ide to use blk_get_request properly if you want.
> 
> That would be best, but the on-stack allocation has the benefit that
> it'll always work. So until we can completely get rid of that, lets just
> make it a hard rule that ANY rq allocation MUST call rq_init(). It's a
> lot saner than doing a memset() anyway.
> 

Just a patch that I had for ages since the bad old request bidi times,
perhaps is also good today. (rebased to for-2.6.26 branch)
---
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:05:33 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Initialize all members of struct request in rq_init

Before, every member added/removed from struct request would entitle a change
to rq_init, for initialization. Now all members are default to zero and only
the none zero members are specifically initialized.

Users that need requests on the stack or pre-allocated, must call rq_init()
before use.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c |   22 ++--------------------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 6f0968f..3f4c563 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -113,36 +113,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_get_backing_dev_info);
  */
 void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 {
+	memset(rq, 0, sizeof(*rq));
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->queuelist);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->donelist);
 	rq->q = q;
 	rq->sector = rq->hard_sector = (sector_t) -1;
-	rq->nr_sectors = rq->hard_nr_sectors = 0;
-	rq->current_nr_sectors = rq->hard_cur_sectors = 0;
-	rq->bio = rq->biotail = NULL;
 	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&rq->hash);
 	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rq->rb_node);
-	rq->rq_disk = NULL;
-	rq->nr_phys_segments = 0;
-	rq->nr_hw_segments = 0;
-	rq->ioprio = 0;
-	rq->special = NULL;
-	rq->buffer = NULL;
 	rq->tag = -1;
-	rq->errors = 0;
 	rq->ref_count = 1;
-	rq->cmd_len = 0;
 	rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
-	memset(rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB);
-	rq->data_len = 0;
-	rq->extra_len = 0;
-	rq->sense_len = 0;
-	rq->data = NULL;
-	rq->sense = NULL;
-	rq->end_io = NULL;
-	rq->end_io_data = NULL;
-	rq->next_rq = NULL;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rq_init);
 
 static void req_bio_endio(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
 			  unsigned int nbytes, int error)
-- 
1.5.3.3


  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-16  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-25 16:21 [PATCHSET 0/3] Is it time for varlen extended and vendor-specific cdbs Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-25 16:22 ` [PATCH] Let scsi_cmnd->cmnd use request->cmd buffer Boaz Harrosh
2008-03-25 16:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] block layer varlen-cdb Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-03 16:43   ` James Bottomley
2008-04-03 17:26     ` Benny Halevy
2008-04-03 18:32     ` [PATCH 2/3 ver2] block layer extended-cdb support Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-04 11:46       ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-06  9:35         ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-06 11:05           ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-07  8:31             ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-12  5:52           ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-13  9:13             ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-13 16:17               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-13 16:50                 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-14  9:49                   ` [PATCH 2/3 ver3] " Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-14 11:04                     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 11:28                       ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-14 12:08                         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 12:22                           ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-14 11:04                   ` [PATCH 2/3 ver2] " FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 10:50                 ` [PATCH 0/4] add large command support to the block layer FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 10:50                   ` [PATCH 1/4] block: no need to initialize rq->cmd in prepare_flush_fn hook FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 10:50                     ` [PATCH 2/4] block: no need to initialize rq->cmd with blk_get_request FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 10:50                       ` [PATCH 3/4] block: replace sizeof(rq->cmd) with BLK_MAX_CDB FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 10:50                         ` [PATCH 4/4] block: add large command support FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 11:29                           ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-14 12:08                             ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15 22:50                             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-15 22:57                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-16  0:22                                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-16  8:33                                 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-16  9:08                                   ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2008-04-16  9:42                                     ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-16 22:28                                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17  3:59                                     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-17  7:07                                       ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-17 11:55                                         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 11:58                                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 12:07                                         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-17  4:02                                   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 14:41                           ` Pete Wyckoff
2008-04-14 22:33                             ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15 13:44                               ` Pete Wyckoff
2008-04-15  7:45                             ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-15 10:05                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15  7:29                           ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-14 11:21                   ` [PATCH 0/4] add large command support to the block layer FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 11:38                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-14 12:36                     ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-14 13:06                       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15 12:24                   ` [PATCH 0/3] scsi: variable-length CDBs support Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-15 12:30                     ` [PATCH 1/3] Let scsi_cmnd->cmnd use request->cmd buffer Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-15 12:34                     ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: varlen extended and vendor-specific cdbs Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-16  2:09                       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-16  6:40                         ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-16  6:49                           ` [PATCH 2/3 ver2] " Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-17  4:01                           ` [PATCH 2/3] " FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-17 12:25                             ` [PATCH 2/3 ver3] " Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-17 12:49                               ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-17 13:04                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-17 13:29                                 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-15 12:37                     ` [PATCH 3/3] iscsi_tcp: Enable large commands Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-15 13:08                       ` James Smart
2008-04-15 13:38                         ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-15 13:57                           ` Benny Halevy
2008-04-15 13:46                         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-13 14:07             ` [PATCH 2/3 ver2] block layer extended-cdb support James Bottomley
2008-04-13 16:17               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-25 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: varlen extended and vendor-specific cdbs Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-03 16:07 ` [PATCHSET 0/3] Is it time for " Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-13 16:30 ` [PATCHSET 0/4 ver2] " Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-13 16:37   ` [PATCH 1/4] Let scsi_cmnd->cmnd use request->cmd buffer Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-13 16:39   ` [PATCH 2/4] block layer extended-cdb support Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-13 16:39   ` [PATCH 3/4] scsi: varlen extended and vendor-specific cdbs Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-13 16:41   ` [PATCH 4/4] iscsi_tcp: Enable large command Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-18 17:11     ` Mike Christie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4805C209.6040606@panasas.com \
    --to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).