From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi_host regression: fix scsi host leak
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:50:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485315E8.1090005@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213230060-11388-1-git-send-email-michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]
michaelc@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
> From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>
> In 2.6.25 we started using class_find_child instead of implementing
> our own loop and lookup. The problem is that class_find_child would get a
> reference to the host's device, then scsi_host_lookup would get an extra
> reference to it when it called scsi_host_get().
>
> In 2.6.26 we started using class_find_device, and this function also
> gets a reference to the device, so we end up with an extra ref
> and the host will not get released.
>
> This patch is made against scsi-rc-fixes and adds a put_device to
> balance the class_find_device() get. I kept the scsi_host_get in
> scsi_host_lookup, because the target layer is using scsi_host_lookup
> and it looks like it needs the SHOST_DEL check.
>
> For 2.6.25 we need a similar patch, but instead of calling
> put_device we have to call class_device_put() due to the differences
> in the the driver model device/class_device between 2.6.25 and
> 2.6.26. I can send a patch for 2.6.25 in a seperate mail.
>
Attached is a patch for 2.6.25. Sorry it is late and attached instead of
inlined. I can send it in a new thread if you want too. I just want to
make sure people know it is slightly different from the scsi-rc-fixes
patch because of the driver model changes.
[-- Attachment #2: fix-host-refcount.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 927 bytes --]
In 2.6.25 we started using class_find_child instead of implementing
our own loop and lookup. The problem is that class_find_child would get a
reference to the host's device, then scsi_host_lookup would get an extra
reference to it when it called scsi_host_get(). This patch drops the
ref from class_find_child because scsi_host_get gets a ref if the host
is not being removed.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
--- linux-2.6.25.2/drivers/scsi/hosts.c 2008-05-06 18:21:32.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25.2.work/drivers/scsi/hosts.c 2008-06-13 19:43:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -455,9 +455,10 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_lookup(unsig
struct Scsi_Host *shost = ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
cdev = class_find_child(&shost_class, &hostnum, __scsi_host_match);
- if (cdev)
+ if (cdev) {
shost = scsi_host_get(class_to_shost(cdev));
-
+ class_device_put(cdev);
+ }
return shost;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_lookup);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-14 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-12 0:21 [PATCH 1/1] scsi_host regression: fix scsi host leak michaelc
2008-06-14 0:50 ` Mike Christie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485315E8.1090005@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox