* [PATCH 1/1] scsi_host regression: fix scsi host leak
@ 2008-06-12 0:21 michaelc
2008-06-14 0:50 ` Mike Christie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: michaelc @ 2008-06-12 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi; +Cc: Mike Christie
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
In 2.6.25 we started using class_find_child instead of implementing
our own loop and lookup. The problem is that class_find_child would get a
reference to the host's device, then scsi_host_lookup would get an extra
reference to it when it called scsi_host_get().
In 2.6.26 we started using class_find_device, and this function also
gets a reference to the device, so we end up with an extra ref
and the host will not get released.
This patch is made against scsi-rc-fixes and adds a put_device to
balance the class_find_device() get. I kept the scsi_host_get in
scsi_host_lookup, because the target layer is using scsi_host_lookup
and it looks like it needs the SHOST_DEL check.
For 2.6.25 we need a similar patch, but instead of calling
put_device we have to call class_device_put() due to the differences
in the the driver model device/class_device between 2.6.25 and
2.6.26. I can send a patch for 2.6.25 in a seperate mail.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
---
drivers/scsi/hosts.c | 9 +++++++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index 3690360..c6457bf 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
@@ -456,6 +456,10 @@ static int __scsi_host_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
*
* Return value:
* A pointer to located Scsi_Host or NULL.
+ *
+ * The caller must do a scsi_host_put() to drop the reference
+ * that scsi_host_get() took. The put_device() below dropped
+ * the reference from class_find_device().
**/
struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_lookup(unsigned short hostnum)
{
@@ -463,9 +467,10 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_lookup(unsigned short hostnum)
struct Scsi_Host *shost = ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
cdev = class_find_device(&shost_class, &hostnum, __scsi_host_match);
- if (cdev)
+ if (cdev) {
shost = scsi_host_get(class_to_shost(cdev));
-
+ put_device(cdev);
+ }
return shost;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_lookup);
--
1.5.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi_host regression: fix scsi host leak
2008-06-12 0:21 [PATCH 1/1] scsi_host regression: fix scsi host leak michaelc
@ 2008-06-14 0:50 ` Mike Christie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Christie @ 2008-06-14 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]
michaelc@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
> From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>
> In 2.6.25 we started using class_find_child instead of implementing
> our own loop and lookup. The problem is that class_find_child would get a
> reference to the host's device, then scsi_host_lookup would get an extra
> reference to it when it called scsi_host_get().
>
> In 2.6.26 we started using class_find_device, and this function also
> gets a reference to the device, so we end up with an extra ref
> and the host will not get released.
>
> This patch is made against scsi-rc-fixes and adds a put_device to
> balance the class_find_device() get. I kept the scsi_host_get in
> scsi_host_lookup, because the target layer is using scsi_host_lookup
> and it looks like it needs the SHOST_DEL check.
>
> For 2.6.25 we need a similar patch, but instead of calling
> put_device we have to call class_device_put() due to the differences
> in the the driver model device/class_device between 2.6.25 and
> 2.6.26. I can send a patch for 2.6.25 in a seperate mail.
>
Attached is a patch for 2.6.25. Sorry it is late and attached instead of
inlined. I can send it in a new thread if you want too. I just want to
make sure people know it is slightly different from the scsi-rc-fixes
patch because of the driver model changes.
[-- Attachment #2: fix-host-refcount.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 927 bytes --]
In 2.6.25 we started using class_find_child instead of implementing
our own loop and lookup. The problem is that class_find_child would get a
reference to the host's device, then scsi_host_lookup would get an extra
reference to it when it called scsi_host_get(). This patch drops the
ref from class_find_child because scsi_host_get gets a ref if the host
is not being removed.
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
--- linux-2.6.25.2/drivers/scsi/hosts.c 2008-05-06 18:21:32.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.25.2.work/drivers/scsi/hosts.c 2008-06-13 19:43:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -455,9 +455,10 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_lookup(unsig
struct Scsi_Host *shost = ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
cdev = class_find_child(&shost_class, &hostnum, __scsi_host_match);
- if (cdev)
+ if (cdev) {
shost = scsi_host_get(class_to_shost(cdev));
-
+ class_device_put(cdev);
+ }
return shost;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_lookup);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-14 1:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-12 0:21 [PATCH 1/1] scsi_host regression: fix scsi host leak michaelc
2008-06-14 0:50 ` Mike Christie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox