From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16 (crash on quad core AMD) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:35:02 +0900 Message-ID: <4884ACA6.9080509@gmail.com> References: <20080716235011.ac9643aa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200807170053.36661.rjw@sisk.pl> <1216249292.3358.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200807170109.30655.rjw@sisk.pl> <48808EE0.2060603@gmail.com> <20080719004736.626ef169@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> <48813C5F.70007@gmail.com> <20080719033050.552f9b49@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> <48814D81.8060001@gmail.com> <20080719140717.7b296eae@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> <4881F437.7000503@gmail.com> <20080721004033.1fc66aa3@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> <4883DA8C.5030306@gmail.com> <20080721133209.62e31bc8@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.191]:52578 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752177AbYGUPfW (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:35:22 -0400 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b6so852303tic.23 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:35:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080721133209.62e31bc8@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Pierre Ossman Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , James Bottomley , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , scsi , Jens Axboe , linux-ide , Jeff Garzik , Takashi Iwai , tino.keitel@gmx.de Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:38:36 +0900 > Tejun Heo wrote: > >> I think it needs an ACK from Jens. Jens? > > He seems to be on vacation. I sent him a review request for my original > code a couple of weeks ago, and I haven't heard anything. marc.info > also doesn't show anything since the 3rd. Odds are he won't be back > during the merge window. :/ Right, I have a patchset waiting for his review too. Anyone knows when he'll be back? We can always back it out later but I don't think pushing stuff in w/o maintainer's ack is a good idea. :-( -- tejun