public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* scsi: Generalise last_sector_bug; fixes regression and potential future issues on USB cardreaders
       [not found] <4888524D.9070906@tuffmail.co.uk>
@ 2008-07-24 10:15 ` Alan Jenkins
  2008-07-26 19:26   ` James Bottomley
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Jenkins @ 2008-07-24 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James.Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi, Alan Stern

The last_sector_bug flag was added to work around a bug in certain usb
cardreaders, where they would crash if a multiple sector read included the
last sector. The original implementation avoids this by e.g. splitting an 8
sector read which includes the last sector into a 7 sector read, and a single
sector read for the last sector.  The flag is enabled for all USB devices.

This revealed a second bug in other usb cardreaders, which crash when they
get a multiple sector read which stops 1 sector short of the last sector.
Affected hardware includes the Kingston "MobileLite" external USB cardreader
and the internal USB cardreader on the Asus EeePC.

Extend the last_sector_bug workaround to ensure that any access which touches
the last 8 hardware sectors of the device is a single sector long.  Requests
are shrunk as necessary to meet this constraint.

This gives us a safety margin against potential unknown or future bugs
affecting multi-sector access to the end of the device.  The two known bugs
only affect the last 2 sectors.  However, they suggest that these devices
are prone to fencepost errors and that multi-sector access to the end of the
device is not well tested.  Popular OS's use multi-sector accesses, but they
rarely read the last few sectors.  Linux (with udev & vol_id) automatically
reads sectors from the end of the device on insertion.  It is assumed that
single sector accesses are more thoroughly tested during development.

Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Tested-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 01cefbb..2415a1b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -406,13 +406,23 @@ static int sd_prep_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Some devices (some sdcards for one) don't like it if the
-	 * last sector gets read in a larger then 1 sector read.
+	 * Some sd cardreaders can't handle multisector accesses which touch
+	 * the last one or two hardware sectors.  There are likely to be even
+	 * buggier devices, so apply a workaround to the last eight sectors.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(sdp->last_sector_bug &&
-	    rq->nr_sectors > sdp->sector_size / 512 &&
-	    block + this_count == get_capacity(disk)))
-		this_count -= sdp->sector_size / 512;
+	if (sdp->last_sector_bug) {
+		unsigned threshold = get_capacity(disk) - 8 * (sdp->sector_size / 512);
+
+		if (block + this_count <= threshold) {
+			;	/* Okay as is */
+		} else if (block < threshold) {
+			/* Access up to the threshold but not beyond */
+			this_count = threshold - block;
+		} else {
+			/* Access only a single hardware sector */
+			this_count = sdp->sector_size / 512;
+		}
+	}
 
 	SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(2, scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, SCpnt, "block=%llu\n",
 					(unsigned long long)block));
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
index f6a9fe0..0d8d9c1 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
@@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ struct scsi_device {
 	unsigned fix_capacity:1;	/* READ_CAPACITY is too high by 1 */
 	unsigned guess_capacity:1;	/* READ_CAPACITY might be too high by 1 */
 	unsigned retry_hwerror:1;	/* Retry HARDWARE_ERROR */
-	unsigned last_sector_bug:1;	/* Always read last sector in a 1 sector read */
+	unsigned last_sector_bug:1;	/* do not use multisector accesses on
+					   the last 8 hardware sectors */
 
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(supported_events, SDEV_EVT_MAXBITS); /* supported events */
 	struct list_head event_list;	/* asserted events */



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: scsi: Generalise last_sector_bug; fixes regression and potential future issues on USB cardreaders
  2008-07-24 10:15 ` scsi: Generalise last_sector_bug; fixes regression and potential future issues on USB cardreaders Alan Jenkins
@ 2008-07-26 19:26   ` James Bottomley
  2008-07-27  8:36     ` Alan Jenkins
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2008-07-26 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Jenkins; +Cc: linux-scsi, Alan Stern

On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 11:15 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> The last_sector_bug flag was added to work around a bug in certain usb
> cardreaders, where they would crash if a multiple sector read included the
> last sector. The original implementation avoids this by e.g. splitting an 8
> sector read which includes the last sector into a 7 sector read, and a single
> sector read for the last sector.  The flag is enabled for all USB devices.
> 
> This revealed a second bug in other usb cardreaders, which crash when they
> get a multiple sector read which stops 1 sector short of the last sector.
> Affected hardware includes the Kingston "MobileLite" external USB cardreader
> and the internal USB cardreader on the Asus EeePC.
> 
> Extend the last_sector_bug workaround to ensure that any access which touches
> the last 8 hardware sectors of the device is a single sector long.  Requests
> are shrunk as necessary to meet this constraint.
> 
> This gives us a safety margin against potential unknown or future bugs
> affecting multi-sector access to the end of the device.  The two known bugs
> only affect the last 2 sectors.  However, they suggest that these devices
> are prone to fencepost errors and that multi-sector access to the end of the
> device is not well tested.  Popular OS's use multi-sector accesses, but they
> rarely read the last few sectors.  Linux (with udev & vol_id) automatically
> reads sectors from the end of the device on insertion.  It is assumed that
> single sector accesses are more thoroughly tested during development.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
> Tested-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 01cefbb..2415a1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -406,13 +406,23 @@ static int sd_prep_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Some devices (some sdcards for one) don't like it if the
> -	 * last sector gets read in a larger then 1 sector read.
> +	 * Some sd cardreaders can't handle multisector accesses which touch
> +	 * the last one or two hardware sectors.  There are likely to be even
> +	 * buggier devices, so apply a workaround to the last eight sectors.
>  	 */
> -	if (unlikely(sdp->last_sector_bug &&
> -	    rq->nr_sectors > sdp->sector_size / 512 &&
> -	    block + this_count == get_capacity(disk)))
> -		this_count -= sdp->sector_size / 512;
> +	if (sdp->last_sector_bug) {

This should be unlikely() as the previous one was

> +		unsigned threshold = get_capacity(disk) - 8 * (sdp->sector_size / 512);

This can't be an unsigned, it has to be sector_t otherwise it could
overflow on large capacity drives.

I can also see that someone will find a drive that needs the last 16 or
something sectors, so perhaps the bare 8 should be a nice #define in
sd.h (comment above would need altering too).

> +		if (block + this_count <= threshold) {

This should be likely() as well.

> +			;	/* Okay as is */
> +		} else if (block < threshold) {
> +			/* Access up to the threshold but not beyond */
> +			this_count = threshold - block;
> +		} else {
> +			/* Access only a single hardware sector */
> +			this_count = sdp->sector_size / 512;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(2, scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, SCpnt, "block=%llu\n",
>  					(unsigned long long)block));
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> index f6a9fe0..0d8d9c1 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
> @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ struct scsi_device {
>  	unsigned fix_capacity:1;	/* READ_CAPACITY is too high by 1 */
>  	unsigned guess_capacity:1;	/* READ_CAPACITY might be too high by 1 */
>  	unsigned retry_hwerror:1;	/* Retry HARDWARE_ERROR */
> -	unsigned last_sector_bug:1;	/* Always read last sector in a 1 sector read */
> +	unsigned last_sector_bug:1;	/* do not use multisector accesses on
> +					   the last 8 hardware sectors */
>  
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(supported_events, SDEV_EVT_MAXBITS); /* supported events */
>  	struct list_head event_list;	/* asserted events */

Everything else looks fine ... do a quick turn around and I'll slide it
under the merge window.

Thanks,

James



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: scsi: Generalise last_sector_bug; fixes regression and potential future issues on USB cardreaders
  2008-07-26 19:26   ` James Bottomley
@ 2008-07-27  8:36     ` Alan Jenkins
  2008-07-27  8:38       ` [PATCH] " Alan Jenkins
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Jenkins @ 2008-07-27  8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi, Alan Stern

James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 11:15 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>   
>> The last_sector_bug flag was added to work around a bug in certain usb
>> cardreaders, where they would crash if a multiple sector read included the
>> last sector. The original implementation avoids this by e.g. splitting an 8
>> sector read which includes the last sector into a 7 sector read, and a single
>> sector read for the last sector.  The flag is enabled for all USB devices.
>>
>> This revealed a second bug in other usb cardreaders, which crash when they
>> get a multiple sector read which stops 1 sector short of the last sector.
>> Affected hardware includes the Kingston "MobileLite" external USB cardreader
>> and the internal USB cardreader on the Asus EeePC.
>>
>> Extend the last_sector_bug workaround to ensure that any access which touches
>> the last 8 hardware sectors of the device is a single sector long.  Requests
>> are shrunk as necessary to meet this constraint.
>>
>> This gives us a safety margin against potential unknown or future bugs
>> affecting multi-sector access to the end of the device.  The two known bugs
>> only affect the last 2 sectors.  However, they suggest that these devices
>> are prone to fencepost errors and that multi-sector access to the end of the
>> device is not well tested.  Popular OS's use multi-sector accesses, but they
>> rarely read the last few sectors.  Linux (with udev & vol_id) automatically
>> reads sectors from the end of the device on insertion.  It is assumed that
>> single sector accesses are more thoroughly tested during development.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
>> Tested-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
>> index 01cefbb..2415a1b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
>> @@ -406,13 +406,23 @@ static int sd_prep_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	/*
>> -	 * Some devices (some sdcards for one) don't like it if the
>> -	 * last sector gets read in a larger then 1 sector read.
>> +	 * Some sd cardreaders can't handle multisector accesses which touch
>> +	 * the last one or two hardware sectors.  There are likely to be even
>> +	 * buggier devices, so apply a workaround to the last eight sectors.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (unlikely(sdp->last_sector_bug &&
>> -	    rq->nr_sectors > sdp->sector_size / 512 &&
>> -	    block + this_count == get_capacity(disk)))
>> -		this_count -= sdp->sector_size / 512;
>> +	if (sdp->last_sector_bug) {
>>     
>
> This should be unlikely() as the previous one was
>   

Fine.  I'll change it back to a single combined unlikely() test.

threshold = ...
if (unlikely(sdp->last_sector_bug && block + this_count > threshold)) {



>> +		unsigned threshold = get_capacity(disk) - 8 * (sdp->sector_size / 512);
>>     
>
> This can't be an unsigned, it has to be sector_t otherwise it could
> overflow on large capacity drives.
>   
Ok.

> I can also see that someone will find a drive that needs the last 16 or
> something sectors, so perhaps the bare 8 should be a nice #define in
> sd.h (comment above would need altering too).
>
>   
Good idea.

>   
>> +		if (block + this_count <= threshold) {
>>     
>
> This should be likely() as well.
>
>   
(see above)

>   
>> +			;	/* Okay as is */
>> +		} else if (block < threshold) {
>> +			/* Access up to the threshold but not beyond */
>> +			this_count = threshold - block;
>> +		} else {
>> +			/* Access only a single hardware sector */
>> +			this_count = sdp->sector_size / 512;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(2, scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, SCpnt, "block=%llu\n",
>>  					(unsigned long long)block));
>> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
>> index f6a9fe0..0d8d9c1 100644
>> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
>> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
>> @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ struct scsi_device {
>>  	unsigned fix_capacity:1;	/* READ_CAPACITY is too high by 1 */
>>  	unsigned guess_capacity:1;	/* READ_CAPACITY might be too high by 1 */
>>  	unsigned retry_hwerror:1;	/* Retry HARDWARE_ERROR */
>> -	unsigned last_sector_bug:1;	/* Always read last sector in a 1 sector read */
>> +	unsigned last_sector_bug:1;	/* do not use multisector accesses on
>> +					   the last 8 hardware sectors */
>>  
>>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(supported_events, SDEV_EVT_MAXBITS); /* supported events */
>>  	struct list_head event_list;	/* asserted events */
>>     
>
> Everything else looks fine ... do a quick turn around and I'll slide it
> under the merge window.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] scsi: Generalise last_sector_bug; fixes regression and potential future issues on USB cardreaders
  2008-07-27  8:36     ` Alan Jenkins
@ 2008-07-27  8:38       ` Alan Jenkins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Jenkins @ 2008-07-27  8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-scsi, Alan Stern

The last_sector_bug flag was added to work around a bug in certain usb
cardreaders, where they would crash if a multiple sector read included the
last sector. The original implementation avoids this by e.g. splitting an 8
sector read which includes the last sector into a 7 sector read, and a single
sector read for the last sector.  The flag is enabled for all USB devices.

This revealed a second bug in other usb cardreaders, which crash when they
get a multiple sector read which stops 1 sector short of the last sector.
Affected hardware includes the Kingston "MobileLite" external USB cardreader
and the internal USB cardreader on the Asus EeePC.

Extend the last_sector_bug workaround to ensure that any access which touches
the last 8 hardware sectors of the device is a single sector long.  Requests
are shrunk as necessary to meet this constraint.

This gives us a safety margin against potential unknown or future bugs
affecting multi-sector access to the end of the device.  The two known bugs
only affect the last 2 sectors.  However, they suggest that these devices
are prone to fencepost errors and that multi-sector access to the end of the
device is not well tested.  Popular OS's use multi-sector accesses, but they
rarely read the last few sectors.  Linux (with udev & vol_id) automatically
reads sectors from the end of the device on insertion.  It is assumed that
single sector accesses are more thoroughly tested during development.

Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Tested-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 01cefbb..a2b2cd7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ static int sd_prep_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 	struct scsi_device *sdp = q->queuedata;
 	struct gendisk *disk = rq->rq_disk;
 	sector_t block = rq->sector;
+	sector_t threshold;
 	unsigned int this_count = rq->nr_sectors;
 	unsigned int timeout = sdp->timeout;
 	int ret;
@@ -406,13 +407,21 @@ static int sd_prep_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Some devices (some sdcards for one) don't like it if the
-	 * last sector gets read in a larger then 1 sector read.
+	 * Some SD card readers can't handle multi-sector accesses which touch
+	 * the last one or two hardware sectors.  Split accesses as needed.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(sdp->last_sector_bug &&
-	    rq->nr_sectors > sdp->sector_size / 512 &&
-	    block + this_count == get_capacity(disk)))
-		this_count -= sdp->sector_size / 512;
+	threshold = get_capacity(disk) - SD_LAST_BUGGY_SECTORS *
+		(sdp->sector_size / 512);
+
+	if (unlikely(sdp->last_sector_bug && block + this_count > threshold)) {
+		if (block < threshold) {
+			/* Access up to the threshold but not beyond */
+			this_count = threshold - block;
+		} else {
+			/* Access only a single hardware sector */
+			this_count = sdp->sector_size / 512;
+		}
+	}
 
 	SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(2, scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, SCpnt, "block=%llu\n",
 					(unsigned long long)block));
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
index f6a9fe0..17b6c02 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
@@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ struct scsi_device {
 	unsigned fix_capacity:1;	/* READ_CAPACITY is too high by 1 */
 	unsigned guess_capacity:1;	/* READ_CAPACITY might be too high by 1 */
 	unsigned retry_hwerror:1;	/* Retry HARDWARE_ERROR */
-	unsigned last_sector_bug:1;	/* Always read last sector in a 1 sector read */
+	unsigned last_sector_bug:1;	/* do not use multisector accesses on
+					   SD_LAST_BUGGY_SECTORS */
 
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(supported_events, SDEV_EVT_MAXBITS); /* supported events */
 	struct list_head event_list;	/* asserted events */
diff --git a/include/scsi/sd.h b/include/scsi/sd.h
index 4f032d4..d0364ff 100644
--- a/include/scsi/sd.h
+++ b/include/scsi/sd.h
@@ -31,6 +31,12 @@
  */
 #define SD_BUF_SIZE		512
 
+/*
+ * Number of sectors at the end of the device to avoid multi-sector accesses to
+ * in the case of last_sector_bug
+ */
+#define SD_LAST_BUGGY_SECTORS	8
+
 struct scsi_disk {
 	struct scsi_driver *driver;	/* always &sd_template */
 	struct scsi_device *device;



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-27  8:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <4888524D.9070906@tuffmail.co.uk>
2008-07-24 10:15 ` scsi: Generalise last_sector_bug; fixes regression and potential future issues on USB cardreaders Alan Jenkins
2008-07-26 19:26   ` James Bottomley
2008-07-27  8:36     ` Alan Jenkins
2008-07-27  8:38       ` [PATCH] " Alan Jenkins

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox