From: HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][SCSI] hptiop: add more PCI device IDs
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:52:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488ECC3D.9010502@highpoint-tech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729003419.1b754608.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
At 2008/7/29 15:34, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:29:24 +0800 HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Add PCI device ID for new adapter models.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/scsi/hptiop.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff -purN linux-2.6.26-rc8/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c linux-2.6.26-rc8-hpt/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c
>> --- linux-2.6.26-rc8/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c 2008-06-25 09:58:20.000000000 +0800
>> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc8-hpt/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c 2008-07-24 15:09:50.000000000 +0800
>> @@ -1249,6 +1249,13 @@ static struct pci_device_id hptiop_id_ta
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3522), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3410), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3540), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3530), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3560), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4322), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4210), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4211), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4310), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4311), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3120), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_mv_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3122), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_mv_ops },
>> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3020), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_mv_ops },
>>
>
> I assume that this patch makes new devices work, whereas they do not
> work correctly in unpatched kernels, yes?
>
> If so, then this patch should be backported into 2.6.25.x and 2.6.26.x.
> Users of these kernels would presumably like their devices to work.
>
Yes, this patch should also be backported to 2.6.25.x and 2.6.26.x.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-29 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 5:29 [PATCH][SCSI] hptiop: add more PCI device IDs HighPoint Linux Team
2008-07-29 7:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-29 7:52 ` HighPoint Linux Team [this message]
2008-07-31 16:50 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-07-31 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488ECC3D.9010502@highpoint-tech.com \
--to=linux@highpoint-tech.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox