From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: David Somayajulu <david.somayajulu@qlogic.com>
Cc: James.Smart@Emulex.Com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
David Wagner <david.wagner@qlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi:netlink support in scsi and fc transports forhba specific messages
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 02:18:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4896AD4F.2080101@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0BB3E5E7462EEA4295BC02D49691DC07015B4249@AVEXCH1.qlogic.org>
David Somayajulu wrote:
>> - Your recently added scsi_host_put() was very wrong. You never
>> had a corresponding get().
> Oops. The version I was looking at for cross reference had a get() in
> scsi_host_lookup() and no corresponding put(). Looks like
> scsi_host_lookup() has changed at some point. (I think Mike Christie was
> under the same impression when he suggested this).
I think you guys are missing the get() from class_find_device or what
versions are you guys looking at? I have this from scsi-misc from today:
cdev = class_find_device(&shost_class, &hostnum,
__scsi_host_match);
if (cdev) {
shost = scsi_host_get(class_to_shost(cdev));
put_device(cdev);
}
If class_find_device finds a device class_find_device does a get on it. +1
If class_find_device found a device (cdev is non null)
scsi_host_lookup() does another get() on it if the host is not being
deleted. +1 (total =2)
scsi_host_lookup will then release the get() done from
class_find_device. -1 (total =1)
So if scsi_host_lookup returns with a host there will be a reference on
the host that must be released when we are done with it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-30 21:53 [PATCH 1/2] scsi:netlink support in scsi and fc transports for hba specific messages David Somayajulu
2008-07-31 2:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi:netlink support in scsi and fc transports for hbaspecific messages James.Smart
2008-07-31 18:58 ` David Somayajulu
2008-08-01 0:35 ` James.Smart
2008-08-01 18:03 ` David Somayajulu
2008-07-31 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi:netlink support in scsi and fc transports for hba specific messages Mike Christie
2008-07-31 3:35 ` David Somayajulu
2008-08-02 18:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi:netlink support in scsi and fc transports forhba " James.Smart
2008-08-03 6:16 ` David Somayajulu
2008-08-04 7:18 ` Mike Christie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4896AD4F.2080101@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=david.somayajulu@qlogic.com \
--cc=david.wagner@qlogic.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox