From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
To: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
axboe@kernel.dk, andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mike.miller@hp.com,
genanr@emsphone.com, jmoyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] detect online disk resize
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:23:49 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48DA5B85.7090102@vlnb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080829231254.25065.66052.stgit@bluto.andrew>
Andrew Patterson wrote:
> This is version 2 of a patch series I submitted back in May 2008. This
> version now checks for device size changes in the rescan_partitions()
> routine. Which in turn is called when a device is opened and in the
> BLKRRPART ioctl.
>
> I am resubmitting this patch series as I got little response the
> previous time. Al Viro has told me offline that he would look at it this
> time.
>
> This patch series handles online disk resizes that are currently not
> completely recognized by the kernel using the existing revalidate_disk
> routines. An online resize can occur when growing or shrinking a
> Fibre Channel LUN or perhaps by adding a disk to an existing RAID
> volume.
>
> The kernel currently recognizes a device size change when the
> lower-level revalidate_disk routines are called; however, the block
> layer does not use the new size while it has any current openers on
> the device. So, for example, if LVM has an volume open on the device,
> you will generally not see the size change until after a reboot. We
> fix this problem by creating a wrapper to be used with lower-level
> revalidate_disk routines. This wrapper first calls the lower-level
> driver's revalidate_disk routine. It then compares the gendisk
> capacity to the block devices inode size. If there is a difference, we
> adjust the block device's size. If the size has changed, we then flush
> the disk for safety. The size is also checked in rescan_partitions
> which is called when the device is opened or when the BLKRRPART ioctl
> is called.
>
> There are several ways to "kick off" a device size change:
>
> 1. For SCSI devices do:
>
> # echo 1 > /sys/class/scsi_device/<device>/device/rescan
>
> or
>
> # blockdev --rereadpt <device file>
>
> 2. Other devices (not device mapper)
>
> # blockdev --rereadpt <device file>
It would be great if you extend this functionality to automatic resizing
by handling "CAPACITY DATA HAS CHANGED" Unit Attention. If necessary, I
can assist in testing by adding online virtual disks resize feature
together with generation of that UA in SCST (http://scst.sf.net). (It's
not been implemented yet, because no known initiators so far have been
able to use this feature.)
Vlad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-24 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-29 23:12 [PATCH 0/6] detect online disk resize Andrew Patterson
2008-08-29 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] Wrapper for lower-level revalidate_disk routines Andrew Patterson
2008-09-03 18:16 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-08-29 23:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] Adjust block device size after an online resize of a disk Andrew Patterson
2008-09-03 18:17 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-08-29 23:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] Check for device resize when rescanning partitions Andrew Patterson
2008-09-03 18:17 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-08-29 23:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] SCSI sd driver calls revalidate_disk wrapper Andrew Patterson
2008-09-03 18:17 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-08-29 23:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] Added flush_disk to factor out common buffer cache flushing code Andrew Patterson
2008-09-03 18:19 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-09-04 4:16 ` Andrew Patterson
2008-09-04 13:13 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-08-29 23:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] Call flush_disk() after detecting an online resize Andrew Patterson
2008-09-03 18:20 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-09-04 7:26 ` [PATCH 0/6] detect online disk resize Jens Axboe
2008-09-04 14:25 ` Andrew Patterson
2008-09-08 18:01 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-09-09 7:41 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2008-09-24 15:23 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-04 20:27 Andrew Patterson
2008-09-05 7:02 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-05 8:21 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2008-09-05 15:15 ` Andrew Patterson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48DA5B85.7090102@vlnb.net \
--to=vst@vlnb.net \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew.patterson@hp.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=genanr@emsphone.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.miller@hp.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox