public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi : set target can_queue from devinfo flags
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:40:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48DBDB33.3050206@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48DA9240.5090407@cs.wisc.edu>

Mike Christie wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> James Smart wrote:
>>> This patch, discussed in the initial thread on target can_queue limits
>>> (see  http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=120944296225094&w=2 )
>>> allows the target can_queue limit to be obtained from the device list 
>>> based on
>>> Inquiry data obtained during scan.
>>>
>>> I have pinged several of the array vendors to supply target-port 
>>> level values
>>> for their arrays. Hopefully, we will see them populate the device 
>>> list with some
>>> real values shortly.
>>>
>>> This patch was cut against scsi-misc-2.6, and depends on Mike 
>>> Christies patches
>>> contained in the original thread.
>>>
>>> -- james s
>>>
>>> PS: This sure desires the promoting of the starget in sysfs, with an 
>>> attribute
>>>     for the can_queue value.
>>>
>>
>> I was thinking that for the QUEUE_FULL ramp back up problem, I would 
>> do a userspace daemon that after some algorithm decided when it was 
>> time, we could start increasing the queue depth.
>>
>> And then I was thinking that because it needed to know when devices 
>> were getting QUEUE_FULLs so it could figure out when to ramp back up, 
>> it could be based off of a userspace daemon Hannes was talking about 
>> that would pass scsi info/errors to userspace so it could be handled 
>> there (this was originally to handle the sense data that indicated 
>> that the lun data changed and so we were going to kick off a scan and 
>> delete old deices from userspace).
>>
>> Then I was thinking that I could extend the daemon to handle the 
>> problem that this patch was handling too. The daemon would listen for 
>> starget or port kobject addition events. Then it would do a inquiry to 
>> get the target info and match it with some table, then it could write 
>> to a straget->can_queue sysfs file to set the can_queue value.
>>
> 
> Oh yeah, I guess it would not need to be in the error handler userspace 
> daemon and we could just do a udev callout for it.

So what I am asking is we can do the setting of starget->can_queue from:

1. kernel devinfo table like in this patch.

2. udev rule.

3. userspace scsi daemon that handles lots of junk scsi-ml in the kernel 
does not want to handle.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-25 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-13 17:45 [PATCH] scsi : set target can_queue from devinfo flags James Smart
2008-05-14  6:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-14 14:39   ` James Smart
2008-05-14 15:01     ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-14 19:38 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-14 21:50   ` James Smart
2008-05-15  1:21     ` James Smart
2008-09-24 19:13 ` Mike Christie
2008-09-24 19:17   ` Mike Christie
2008-09-25 18:40     ` Mike Christie [this message]
2008-09-25 19:03       ` James Smart
2008-09-24 19:38   ` James Smart
2008-09-25 18:15     ` Mike Christie
2008-09-26  7:46       ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48DBDB33.3050206@cs.wisc.edu \
    --to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
    --cc=hare@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox