From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@novell.com>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi : set target can_queue from devinfo flags
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:46:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48DC9367.6050402@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48DBD53E.4040604@cs.wisc.edu>
Hi Mike,
Mike Christie wrote:
> James Smart wrote:
>> This sounds reasonable, but I wouldn't eliminate this can_queue limit.
>
> I was not going to elimitate it. It is all muddled in the one mail, so
> it is confusing.
>
> I was just going to set it based on target vendor info table in
> userspace from a scsi daemon that was going to handle this issue and
> handle ramp ups due to QUEUE_FULL ramp downs and other scsi issues like
> the handling of sense that indicates disks changes size or report lun
> data changes.
>
> Hannes had mentioned he was making some event infrastructure to handle
> the sense, and I thought I could extend his userspce code to handle the
> ramp up issue and handle setting this value. So for just the
> starget->can_queue issue, the daemon would listen for target hotplug
> events, then it would do sg io to device on it and get the vendor info
> and look up the target in a table and then if found would write to a
> starget->can_queue sysfs file to set the value.
>
Currently I've implemented another scsi netlink event, which just
transports the sense code to the outside world. Next step will be
a daemon which listens to the SCSI netlink events and reacts upon
that; will work largely along the lines udev does.
So we'll be getting a sysfs patch for the device, the message class,
and some payload for the message.
Configuration will quite simple, probably just something like:
[message class]
[payload regex] [command]
[payload regex] [command]
etc.
I'll probably implementing some pre-defined commands like rescan,
but will also add a simple callout for executing commands directly.
> The same daemon could also handle the sense handling and handle other
> errors like when to ramp up from when we ramp down due to QUEUE_FULLs.
> So it is basically a scsi-ml/lib in userpsace that could be easily
> packaged for distros to carry.
Quite easily. Actually, that was the point of that program.
Cheers,
Hannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-26 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-13 17:45 [PATCH] scsi : set target can_queue from devinfo flags James Smart
2008-05-14 6:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-14 14:39 ` James Smart
2008-05-14 15:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-14 19:38 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-14 21:50 ` James Smart
2008-05-15 1:21 ` James Smart
2008-09-24 19:13 ` Mike Christie
2008-09-24 19:17 ` Mike Christie
2008-09-25 18:40 ` Mike Christie
2008-09-25 19:03 ` James Smart
2008-09-24 19:38 ` James Smart
2008-09-25 18:15 ` Mike Christie
2008-09-26 7:46 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48DC9367.6050402@novell.com \
--to=hare@novell.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox