From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: pterjan@gmail.com, matthew@wil.cx, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, sumantp@lsil.com, bo.yang@lsi.com,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11792] New: Oops when reading /proc/megaraid/hba0/diskdrives-ch*
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:51:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FF2FF9.2090104@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081022213418B.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:08:27 +0200
> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:
>
>> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:04:44 +0200
>>> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:22:37 +0200
>>>>> "Pascal Terjan" <pterjan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:47:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Latest working kernel version: 2.6.24
>>>>>>>>> Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.27-rc8
>>>>>>>> It's a regression.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pid: 2319, comm: diff Not tainted (2.6.27-server-0.rc8.2mnb #1)
>>>>>>> It's also a distro kernel by the looks of things. Can it be reproduced
>>>>>>> with an upstream kernel?
>>>>>> I will try booting the server on vanilla kernel but I'm not sure when
>>>>>> (we already rebooted it 2 times recently and users won't enjoy it).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a distro kernel but I don't see patches that could impact this :
>>>>>> http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/kernel/current/PATCHES/patches/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Machine is a old HP NetServer LT 6000
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 04:03.1 I2O: Intel Corporation 80960RP (i960RP) Microprocessor (rev
>>>>>> 09) (prog-if 01)
>>>>>> Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company MegaRAID, Integrated NetRAID
>>>>>> Flags: bus master, fast Back2Back, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11
>>>>>> Memory at f4000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M]
>>>>>> [virtual] Expansion ROM at a8130000 [disabled] [size=32K]
>>>>>> Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
>>>>>> Kernel driver in use: megaraid_legacy
>>>>>> Kernel modules: i2o_core, megaraid
>>>>> This patch helps?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>>>>> index 28c9da7..9294ed8 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>>>>> @@ -4414,12 +4414,14 @@ mega_internal_command(adapter_t *adapter, megacmd_t *mc, mega_passthru *pthru)
>>>>>
>>>>> scmd = &adapter->int_scmd;
>>>>> memset(scmd, 0, sizeof(Scsi_Cmnd));
>>>>> + memset(adapter->int_cdb, 0, sizeof(adapter->int_cdb));
>>>>>
>>>>> sdev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsi_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> scmd->device = sdev;
>>>>>
>>>>> scmd->device->host = adapter->host;
>>>>> scmd->host_scribble = (void *)scb;
>>>>> + scmd->cmnd = adapter->int_cdb;
>>>>> scmd->cmnd[0] = MEGA_INTERNAL_CMD;
>>>>>
>>>>> scb->state |= SCB_ACTIVE;
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h
>>>>> index ee70bd4..5ffec15 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h
>>>>> @@ -889,6 +889,7 @@ typedef struct {
>>>>> u8 sglen; /* f/w supported scatter-gather list length */
>>>>>
>>>>> scb_t int_scb;
>>>>> + unsigned char int_cdb[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
>>>>> Scsi_Cmnd int_scmd;
>>>>> struct mutex int_mtx; /* To synchronize the internal
>>>>> commands */
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Hi TOMO.
>>>>
>>>> This might not be enough for example I don't see the allocation of sense_buffer.
>>>> It might be much easer to allocate using the new command allocation API James
>>>> did, just for such cases. These are: scsi_allocate_command/scsi_free_command
>>> Yeah, it might be. It's fine by me too. But this code path is used
>>> only for issuing internal special commands. It doesn't use the great
>>> portion of scsi_cmnd. For example, these commands don't use sense
>>> buffer, I think. The code path uses scsi_cmnd just for hooking scb_t,
>>> a structure that megaraid allocates per command.
>> OK Thanks.
>> I was not sure because it looks like in mega_cmd_done(), if the status is
>> 0x2 (CHECK_CONDITION) then it would set the sense_buffer. But from what
>> you say, the HW will never return 0x2 in case of an Internal-Command. I
>> Just wanted to make sure.
>
> I thought that all internal commands are non SCSI command but seems
> that there is one exception (issuing INQUIRY as an internal command).
> I'm not sure I understand correctly the driver but anyway here is a
> version using scsi_allocate_command and scsi_free_command.
>
Thanks TOMO.
This is actual my bug from the days of making a scsi_cmnd->cmnd into a pointer,
and skipping this driver.
Reviewed-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> I guess that we need to check the kzalloc failure too but it is
> supposed to be fixed by a different patch.
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
> index 28c9da7..7dc62de 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
> @@ -4402,6 +4402,10 @@ mega_internal_command(adapter_t *adapter, megacmd_t *mc, mega_passthru *pthru)
> scb_t *scb;
> int rval;
>
> + scmd = scsi_allocate_command(GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!scmd)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> /*
> * The internal commands share one command id and hence are
> * serialized. This is so because we want to reserve maximum number of
> @@ -4412,12 +4416,11 @@ mega_internal_command(adapter_t *adapter, megacmd_t *mc, mega_passthru *pthru)
> scb = &adapter->int_scb;
> memset(scb, 0, sizeof(scb_t));
>
> - scmd = &adapter->int_scmd;
> - memset(scmd, 0, sizeof(Scsi_Cmnd));
> -
> sdev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsi_device), GFP_KERNEL);
> scmd->device = sdev;
>
> + memset(adapter->int_cdb, 0, sizeof(adapter->int_cdb));
> + scmd->cmnd = adapter->int_cdb;
> scmd->device->host = adapter->host;
> scmd->host_scribble = (void *)scb;
> scmd->cmnd[0] = MEGA_INTERNAL_CMD;
> @@ -4456,6 +4459,8 @@ mega_internal_command(adapter_t *adapter, megacmd_t *mc, mega_passthru *pthru)
>
> mutex_unlock(&adapter->int_mtx);
>
> + scsi_free_command(GFP_KERNEL, scmd);
> +
> return rval;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h
> index ee70bd4..795201f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h
> @@ -888,8 +888,8 @@ typedef struct {
>
> u8 sglen; /* f/w supported scatter-gather list length */
>
> + unsigned char int_cdb[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
> scb_t int_scb;
> - Scsi_Cmnd int_scmd;
> struct mutex int_mtx; /* To synchronize the internal
> commands */
> struct completion int_waitq; /* wait queue for internal
TODO: One more thing that needs to be done in this driver is one time
allocation of a scsi host-device and use it as a proper
"scmd->device = sdev". And freeing at destruction.
Failing to do so enables a posibility of an internal command been completed
after the deletion of the host.
Thanks again
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-11792-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-10-21 19:47 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 11792] New: Oops when reading /proc/megaraid/hba0/diskdrives-ch* Andrew Morton
2008-10-21 19:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-21 20:22 ` Pascal Terjan
2008-10-21 23:08 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-22 9:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-10-22 9:38 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-22 10:08 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-10-22 12:33 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-22 13:03 ` Yang, Bo
2008-10-22 13:38 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-22 13:59 ` Yang, Bo
2008-10-22 14:20 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-10-22 14:57 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-10-22 15:57 ` Yang, Bo
2008-10-22 17:31 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-10-22 13:51 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2008-10-23 22:49 ` Pascal Terjan
2008-10-24 0:21 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-10-24 13:31 ` Yang, Bo
2008-10-30 13:01 Yang, Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48FF2FF9.2090104@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bo.yang@lsi.com \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=pterjan@gmail.com \
--cc=sumantp@lsil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox