From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC 21/23]: iSCSI target driver Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:01:08 +0300 Message-ID: <4943CE34.9020302@vlnb.net> References: <494009D7.4020602@vlnb.net> <49401205.8010207@vlnb.net> <1229036109.4153.585.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <4942BADE.5010907@vlnb.net> <1229162586.4153.851.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <1229163388.4153.867.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:58569 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752667AbYLMPAv (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:00:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1229163388.4153.867.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: Bart Van Assche , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, LKML , scst-devel Bart Van Assche Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:11 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger >> wrote: >>> To this day I have not seen a single iSCSI-SCST production setup anywhere, nor >>> have I heard anyone considering moving into it into any serious production >>> environments. >> Many people are using iSCSI-SCST in a production setup. Which planet >> do you live on ? >> > > You can continue to gloss over the real issues at hand here, but your > generic handwaving certainly will not get you past RFC-3720 domain > validation. Please stop flooding. If you believe that iSCSI-SCST is so bad so it won't pass some test, prove it! Run your test and show us your the failures. Otherwise your words worth nothing. > Best Regards, > > --nab > >> Bart. >> > >