From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restart scsi_device_lookup_by_target
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:28:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496CB315.8070702@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231860128.4519.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hi James,
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:50 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> currently we have this:
>>
>> struct scsi_device *scsi_device_lookup_by_target(struct scsi_target *starget,
>> uint lun)
>> {
>> struct scsi_device *sdev;
>> struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(starget->dev.parent);
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
>> sdev = __scsi_device_lookup_by_target(starget, lun);
>> if (sdev && scsi_device_get(sdev))
>> sdev = NULL;
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
>>
>> return sdev;
>> }
>>
>> now consider an sdev list with two entries for LUN 0, the first
>> being in SDEV_DEL and the second being in SDEV_RUNNING.
>>
>> scsi_device_lookup_by_target will always return NULL here, as
>> it will never be able to skip past the first (unuseable)
>> entry. So scsi_report_lun_scan will happily create duplicate
>> sdevs for LUN 0 and we'll be getting the infamous
>>
>> sysfs: duplicate filename 'xxxx' can not be created
>>
>> errors.
>>
>> What we should be doing here is to restart
>> __scsi_device_lookup_by_target() if we find an
>> sdev but cannot use it (ie is in SDEV_DEL).
>>
>> James, please apply.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Hannes
>> plain text document attachment (scsi-restart-lookup-by-target)
>> Restart scsi_device_lookup_by_target()
>>
>> When scsi_device_lookup_by_target() will always return
>> the first sdev with a matching LUN, regardless of
>> the state. However, when this sdev is in SDEV_DEL
>> it's quite possible to have additional sdevs in the
>> list with the same LUN which are active.
>> So we should restart __scsi_device_lookup_by_target()
>> whenever we find an sdev with state SDEV_DEL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
>
> That's brilliant, thanks for finding this bug.
>
> rather than go to the trouble of restarting the scan looking for
> duplicates, since none of the users of __scsi_device_lookup_by_target
> actually want invisible dying devices in SDEV_DEL, why not just make it
> skip over them. If we ignore devices in SDEV_DEL, the target id of the
> visible devices should all be unique, so alter the
>
> if (sdev->lun == lun)
>
> to
>
> if (sdev->lun == lun && sdev->sdev_state != SDEV_DEL)
>
> And everything should work.
>
> I think this is the correct fix because scsi_device_get() is also
> programmed to ignore devices in SDEV_DEL (for the same reason).
>
As already mentioned, I'm not sure if esp_scsi.c expects it to
be that way. If someone confirms that we won't break it with this
change, then of course it's the easier way.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-13 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-13 13:50 [PATCH] Restart scsi_device_lookup_by_target Hannes Reinecke
2009-01-13 13:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-13 14:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-01-13 14:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-01-13 14:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-13 14:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-01-13 15:22 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-13 15:28 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2009-01-13 15:32 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496CB315.8070702@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox