public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO
@ 2009-01-20 13:06 Boaz Harrosh
  2009-01-20 13:09 ` Jens Axboe
  2009-01-20 23:10 ` FUJITA Tomonori
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Boaz Harrosh @ 2009-01-20 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: FUJITA Tomonori, Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-scsi, open-osd mailing-list


When submitting requests via SG_IO, which does a sync io, a
bsg_command is not allocated, so an in-Kernel sense_buffer was not
set. However when calling blk_execute_rq() with no sense buffer
one is provided from the stack. Now bsg at blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq()
would check if rq->sense_len and a sense was requested by sg_io_v4
the rq->sense was copy_user() back, but by now it is already mangled
stack memory.

I have fixed that by forcing a sense_buffer when calling bsg_map_hdr().
The bsg_command->sense is provided in the write/read path like before,
and on-the-stack buffer is provided when doing SG_IO.

I have also fixed a dprintk message to print rq->errors in hex because
of the scsi bit-field use of this member. For other block devices it
does not matter anyway.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
 block/bsg.c |   17 ++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
index d414bb5..0ce8806 100644
--- a/block/bsg.c
+++ b/block/bsg.c
@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct request_queue *q, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *rw)
  * map sg_io_v4 to a request.
  */
 static struct request *
-bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm)
+bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm,
+	    u8 *sense)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = bd->queue;
 	struct request *rq, *next_rq = NULL;
@@ -306,6 +307,10 @@ bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm)
 		if (ret)
 			goto out;
 	}
+
+	rq->sense = sense;
+	rq->sense_len = 0;
+
 	return rq;
 out:
 	if (rq->cmd != rq->__cmd)
@@ -348,9 +353,6 @@ static void bsg_rq_end_io(struct request *rq, int uptodate)
 static void bsg_add_command(struct bsg_device *bd, struct request_queue *q,
 			    struct bsg_command *bc, struct request *rq)
 {
-	rq->sense = bc->sense;
-	rq->sense_len = 0;
-
 	/*
 	 * add bc command to busy queue and submit rq for io
 	 */
@@ -419,7 +421,7 @@ static int blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr,
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	dprintk("rq %p bio %p %u\n", rq, bio, rq->errors);
+	dprintk("rq %p bio %p 0x%x\n", rq, bio, rq->errors);
 	/*
 	 * fill in all the output members
 	 */
@@ -635,7 +637,7 @@ static int __bsg_write(struct bsg_device *bd, const char __user *buf,
 		/*
 		 * get a request, fill in the blanks, and add to request queue
 		 */
-		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, has_write_perm);
+		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, has_write_perm, bc->sense);
 		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
 			ret = PTR_ERR(rq);
 			rq = NULL;
@@ -922,11 +924,12 @@ static long bsg_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 		struct request *rq;
 		struct bio *bio, *bidi_bio = NULL;
 		struct sg_io_v4 hdr;
+		u8 sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE];
 
 		if (copy_from_user(&hdr, uarg, sizeof(hdr)))
 			return -EFAULT;
 
-		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &hdr, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE);
+		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &hdr, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE, sense);
 		if (IS_ERR(rq))
 			return PTR_ERR(rq);
 
-- 
1.6.0.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO
  2009-01-20 13:06 [PATCH] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO Boaz Harrosh
@ 2009-01-20 13:09 ` Jens Axboe
  2009-01-29 11:36   ` Boaz Harrosh
  2009-01-20 23:10 ` FUJITA Tomonori
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-01-20 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Boaz Harrosh; +Cc: FUJITA Tomonori, linux-scsi, open-osd mailing-list

On Tue, Jan 20 2009, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> 
> When submitting requests via SG_IO, which does a sync io, a
> bsg_command is not allocated, so an in-Kernel sense_buffer was not
> set. However when calling blk_execute_rq() with no sense buffer
> one is provided from the stack. Now bsg at blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq()
> would check if rq->sense_len and a sense was requested by sg_io_v4
> the rq->sense was copy_user() back, but by now it is already mangled
> stack memory.
> 
> I have fixed that by forcing a sense_buffer when calling bsg_map_hdr().
> The bsg_command->sense is provided in the write/read path like before,
> and on-the-stack buffer is provided when doing SG_IO.
> 
> I have also fixed a dprintk message to print rq->errors in hex because
> of the scsi bit-field use of this member. For other block devices it
> does not matter anyway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>

Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>


> ---
>  block/bsg.c |   17 ++++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
> index d414bb5..0ce8806 100644
> --- a/block/bsg.c
> +++ b/block/bsg.c
> @@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct request_queue *q, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *rw)
>   * map sg_io_v4 to a request.
>   */
>  static struct request *
> -bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm)
> +bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm,
> +	    u8 *sense)
>  {
>  	struct request_queue *q = bd->queue;
>  	struct request *rq, *next_rq = NULL;
> @@ -306,6 +307,10 @@ bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm)
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto out;
>  	}
> +
> +	rq->sense = sense;
> +	rq->sense_len = 0;
> +
>  	return rq;
>  out:
>  	if (rq->cmd != rq->__cmd)
> @@ -348,9 +353,6 @@ static void bsg_rq_end_io(struct request *rq, int uptodate)
>  static void bsg_add_command(struct bsg_device *bd, struct request_queue *q,
>  			    struct bsg_command *bc, struct request *rq)
>  {
> -	rq->sense = bc->sense;
> -	rq->sense_len = 0;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * add bc command to busy queue and submit rq for io
>  	 */
> @@ -419,7 +421,7 @@ static int blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr,
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	dprintk("rq %p bio %p %u\n", rq, bio, rq->errors);
> +	dprintk("rq %p bio %p 0x%x\n", rq, bio, rq->errors);
>  	/*
>  	 * fill in all the output members
>  	 */
> @@ -635,7 +637,7 @@ static int __bsg_write(struct bsg_device *bd, const char __user *buf,
>  		/*
>  		 * get a request, fill in the blanks, and add to request queue
>  		 */
> -		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, has_write_perm);
> +		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, has_write_perm, bc->sense);
>  		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
>  			ret = PTR_ERR(rq);
>  			rq = NULL;
> @@ -922,11 +924,12 @@ static long bsg_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  		struct request *rq;
>  		struct bio *bio, *bidi_bio = NULL;
>  		struct sg_io_v4 hdr;
> +		u8 sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE];
>  
>  		if (copy_from_user(&hdr, uarg, sizeof(hdr)))
>  			return -EFAULT;
>  
> -		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &hdr, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE);
> +		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &hdr, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE, sense);
>  		if (IS_ERR(rq))
>  			return PTR_ERR(rq);
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.0.1
> 

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO
  2009-01-20 13:06 [PATCH] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO Boaz Harrosh
  2009-01-20 13:09 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-01-20 23:10 ` FUJITA Tomonori
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: FUJITA Tomonori @ 2009-01-20 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bharrosh; +Cc: fujita.tomonori, jens.axboe, linux-scsi, osd-dev

On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:06:23 +0200
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:

> 
> When submitting requests via SG_IO, which does a sync io, a
> bsg_command is not allocated, so an in-Kernel sense_buffer was not
> set. However when calling blk_execute_rq() with no sense buffer
> one is provided from the stack. Now bsg at blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq()
> would check if rq->sense_len and a sense was requested by sg_io_v4
> the rq->sense was copy_user() back, but by now it is already mangled
> stack memory.
> 
> I have fixed that by forcing a sense_buffer when calling bsg_map_hdr().
> The bsg_command->sense is provided in the write/read path like before,
> and on-the-stack buffer is provided when doing SG_IO.
> 
> I have also fixed a dprintk message to print rq->errors in hex because
> of the scsi bit-field use of this member. For other block devices it
> does not matter anyway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> ---
>  block/bsg.c |   17 ++++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO
  2009-01-20 13:09 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-01-29 11:36   ` Boaz Harrosh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Boaz Harrosh @ 2009-01-29 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: FUJITA Tomonori, linux-scsi, open-osd mailing-list

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20 2009, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> When submitting requests via SG_IO, which does a sync io, a
>> bsg_command is not allocated, so an in-Kernel sense_buffer was not
>> set. However when calling blk_execute_rq() with no sense buffer
>> one is provided from the stack. Now bsg at blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq()
>> would check if rq->sense_len and a sense was requested by sg_io_v4
>> the rq->sense was copy_user() back, but by now it is already mangled
>> stack memory.
>>
>> I have fixed that by forcing a sense_buffer when calling bsg_map_hdr().
>> The bsg_command->sense is provided in the write/read path like before,
>> and on-the-stack buffer is provided when doing SG_IO.
>>
>> I have also fixed a dprintk message to print rq->errors in hex because
>> of the scsi bit-field use of this member. For other block devices it
>> does not matter anyway.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> 

Jens hi.

Do we need to push this for 2.6.29-rcx. As this is a theoretical
security problem, copying and returning to user-mode a mangled
Kernel stack? Also we might need to push this to stable?

Thanks
Boaz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-29 11:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-20 13:06 [PATCH] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-20 13:09 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-29 11:36   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-20 23:10 ` FUJITA Tomonori

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox