From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kiyoshi Ueda Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] dm-mpath: dynamic load balancers Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:16:33 +0900 Message-ID: <498157D1.2010105@ct.jp.nec.com> References: <20080912.105038.102581623.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> <20090128153704.GA23158@agk.fab.redhat.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090128153704.GA23158@agk.fab.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Alasdair Kergon Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, stefan.bader@canonical.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Hi Alasdair, On 01/29/2009 12:37 AM +0900, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:50:38AM -0400, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: >> The following patches add the following 2 dynamic load balancers >> to request-based dm-multipath: >> o queue-length oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-queue-length. >> o service-time oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-service-time. > > Could we have separate Kconfig options to select them? Sure. I posted the new one rebased on top of 2.6.29-rc2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00183.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00186.html Thanks, Kiyoshi Ueda