From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
stefan.bader@canonical.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] dm-mpath: dynamic load balancers
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:12:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4981F181.2090905@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498157D1.2010105@ct.jp.nec.com>
Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> Hi Alasdair,
>
> On 01/29/2009 12:37 AM +0900, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:50:38AM -0400, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
>>> The following patches add the following 2 dynamic load balancers
>>> to request-based dm-multipath:
>>> o queue-length oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-queue-length.
>>> o service-time oriented dynamic load balancer, dm-service-time.
>>
>> Could we have separate Kconfig options to select them?
>
> Sure.
> I posted the new one rebased on top of 2.6.29-rc2:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00183.html
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-January/msg00186.html
>
For the Kconfig help, is there something we could add to help people
know when to choose one or the other? Sort of like how the block layer
io scheduler (block/Kconfig.iosched) says one might be helpful for
desktops and one is useful for data bses?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-12 14:50 [RFC PATCH 0/4] dm-mpath: dynamic load balancers Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-09-12 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] dm-mpath: add a path selector interface Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-09-12 14:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] dm-mpath: add queue-length oriented dynamic load balancer Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-09-12 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] dm-mpath: interface change for service-time " Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-09-12 14:53 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] dm-mpath: add " Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-01-28 15:37 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] dm-mpath: dynamic load balancers Alasdair G Kergon
2009-01-29 7:16 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-01-29 18:12 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2009-01-30 8:03 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4981F181.2090905@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox