linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC] block: Don't let blk_put_request leak BIOs
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:19:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <499413DB.2020208@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090212184208X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>


If a block ULD had allocated a request and mapped some memory into it,
using one of blk_rq_map_xxx routines, but then for some reason failed to
execute the request through one of the blk_execute_request routines.
Then the associated BIO would leak, unless ULD resorts to low-level loops
intimate of block internals.

[RFC]
  This code will also catch situations where LLD failed to complete
  the request before aborting it. Such situations are a BUG. Should we
  use WARN_ON_ONCE() in that case. The situation above is possible and
  can happen normally in memory pressure situations so maybe we should
  devise a bit-flag that ULD denotes that the request was aborted and
  only WARN_ON if flag was not set.

  I'm sending this before any-tests so people can comment on possible
  pitfalls.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c                 |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c |   17 +----------------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index a824e49..eac96c2 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1055,6 +1055,21 @@ void part_round_stats(int cpu, struct hd_struct *part)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(part_round_stats);
 
 /*
+ * If one of the blk_rq_map_xxx() was called but the request was not
+ * executed by the block layer, then we must release BIOs. Otherwise they
+ * will leak.
+ */
+static void _abort_unexecuted_bios(struct request *req)
+{
+	struct bio *bio;
+
+	while ((bio = req->bio) != NULL) {
+		req->bio = bio->bi_next;
+		bio_endio(bio, 0);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
  * queue lock must be held
  */
 void __blk_put_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
@@ -1066,6 +1081,7 @@ void __blk_put_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
 
 	elv_completed_request(q, req);
 
+	_abort_unexecuted_bios(req);
 	/*
 	 * Request may not have originated from ll_rw_blk. if not,
 	 * it didn't come out of our reserved rq pools
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
index 0bbbf27..8b1cf72 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
@@ -335,20 +335,6 @@ struct osd_request *osd_start_request(struct osd_dev *dev, gfp_t gfp)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(osd_start_request);
 
-/*
- * If osd_finalize_request() was called but the request was not executed through
- * the block layer, then we must release BIOs.
- */
-static void _abort_unexecuted_bios(struct request *rq)
-{
-	struct bio *bio;
-
-	while ((bio = rq->bio) != NULL) {
-		rq->bio = bio->bi_next;
-		bio_endio(bio, 0);
-	}
-}
-
 static void _osd_free_seg(struct osd_request *or __unused,
 	struct _osd_req_data_segment *seg)
 {
@@ -370,11 +356,10 @@ void osd_end_request(struct osd_request *or)
 
 	if (rq) {
 		if (rq->next_rq) {
-			_abort_unexecuted_bios(rq->next_rq);
 			blk_put_request(rq->next_rq);
+			rq->next_rq = NULL;
 		}
 
-		_abort_unexecuted_bios(rq);
 		blk_put_request(rq);
 	}
 	_osd_request_free(or);
-- 
1.6.0.1



  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-12 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-13 16:23 [PATCH 0/3] remove scsi_req_map_sg FUJITA Tomonori
2008-12-13 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] " FUJITA Tomonori
2008-12-13 16:23   ` [PATCH 2/3] block: unexport blk_rq_append_bio FUJITA Tomonori
2008-12-13 16:23     ` [PATCH 3/3] block: unexport bio_add_pc_page FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-10 17:43     ` [PATCH 2/3] block: unexport blk_rq_append_bio James Bottomley
2009-02-10 18:19       ` James Bottomley
2009-02-11  0:21         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-11  8:17         ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-11  8:19           ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-11  9:15           ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-11 14:32             ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-11 14:52               ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-11 15:01                 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-11 15:07                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-11 15:21                     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-11 15:41                       ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-11 16:04                         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-11 16:30                           ` James Bottomley
2009-02-11 17:55                             ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12  1:30                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-12  8:24                                 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12  8:28                                   ` [RFD] blk_rq_map_pages new API Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12  9:19                                     ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12  9:50                                       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-12 10:20                                         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-12 11:34                                           ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12  8:41                                   ` [PATCH 2/3] block: unexport blk_rq_append_bio FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-12  9:14                                     ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12  9:50                                       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-12 12:19                                         ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-02-12 13:49                                           ` [PATCH] [RFC] block: Don't let blk_put_request leak BIOs Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12 13:56                                             ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12 17:27                                               ` [PATCH 1/2] " Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12 17:30                                                 ` [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] libosd: Don't let osd abuse block internals, now that it's fixed Boaz Harrosh
2009-02-12 14:48                               ` [PATCH 2/3] block: unexport blk_rq_append_bio James Bottomley
2009-02-12 16:51                                 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-12-15  7:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] remove scsi_req_map_sg Jens Axboe
2008-12-18  8:14   ` FUJITA Tomonori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=499413DB.2020208@panasas.com \
    --to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).