From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI fixes for 2.6.29-rc5 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:18:24 +0200 Message-ID: <49A11860.3000406@panasas.com> References: <1235170927.9025.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gw-ca.panasas.com ([66.104.249.162]:11919 "EHLO laguna.int.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751969AbZBVJSo (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:18:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1235170927.9025.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-scsi , linux-kernel James Bottomley wrote: > This is a bunch of assorted bug fixes (with several in the qlogic > drivers). > > The patch is available at > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-rc-fixes-2.6.git > > The short changelog is: > > Andrew Vasquez (3): > qla2xxx: Update version number to 8.03.00-k3. > qla2xxx: Mask out 'reserved' bits while processing FLT regions. > qla2xxx: Properly acknowledge IDC notification messages. > > Anirban Chakraborty (2): > qla2xxx: Correct slab-error overwrite during vport creation and deletion. > qla2xxx: Remove interrupt request bit check in the response processing pat > > Brian King (3): > ibmvfc: Increase cancel timeout > ibmvfc: Fix rport relogin > ibmvfc: Fix command timeout errors > > James Smart (1): > scsi_scan: add missing interim SDEV_DEL state if slave_alloc fails > > Julia Lawall (1): > lpfc: introduce missing kfree > > Martin Peschke (1): > sg: fix device number in blktrace data > > Mike Christie (1): > libiscsi: Fix scsi command timeout oops in iscsi_eh_timed_out > > Robert Jennings (1): > ibmvscsi: Correct DMA mapping leak > > Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com (1): > qla2xxx: fix Kernel Panic with Qlogic 2472 Card. > > > And the diffstat > James Hello. Please, you must include a BUG fix patch I sent to the osd_uld, that was found by users, with use of old osd-targets. (It was sitting in next for a while now) It's an obvious BUG, no point of sending it the @stable way later. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg33243.html Do you need that I resend it? Thanks in advance Boaz