From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Smart Subject: Re: [RFC] FC pass thru - Rev V Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:14:47 -0400 Message-ID: <49BCFF47.2050005@emulex.com> References: <1227043498.4949.21.camel@ogier> <1234365225.24194.3.camel@ogier> <3F3E8B49-EB9A-4A6D-ABB0-3F4FC2EF7D1C@qlogic.com> <49BA8E1E.6080809@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <49BCCBC3.7020204@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from emulex.emulex.com ([138.239.112.1]:65251 "EHLO emulex.emulex.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751583AbZCONO7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:14:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49BCCBC3.7020204@panasas.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Sven Schuetz , Seokmann Ju , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Vasquez , "futjita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp" , Giridhar Malavali Current patch is the RFC, at : http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123436574018579&w=2 -- james s Boaz Harrosh wrote: > My humble opinion is: That none of the patches should go in. It is easy > enough to use the API as it is, and it is more correct then any of the > suggested alternatives. > > Please point me to the latest code-base and I'll fix you a patch that I > think looks very simple and will work well. > > Cheers, have a good day > Boaz >