public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: eh_abort_handler and calling scsi_done
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:29:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C8E055.2060108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090324114137.GA8616@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com>

Your assessment sounds correct to me. The other caveat to note is that
if for some reason in your eh_abort_handler you don't think the command
is still outstanding, you should return SUCCESS for this as well.

-Brian

Christof Schmitt wrote:
> I am investigating what is required from a LLD when SCSI commands time
> out and the SCSI EH calls the eh_abort_handler. The documentation in
> scsi_eh.txt states:
> 
>     <<scsi_eh_abort_cmds>>
> 
> 	This action is taken for each timed out command.
> 	hostt->eh_abort_handler() is invoked for each scmd.  The
> 	handler returns SUCCESS if it has succeeded to make LLDD and
> 	all related hardware forget about the scmd.
> 
> From this and from looking at the code, i would conclude:
> 
> 1) If the LLD returns FAILED from the eh_abort_handler, then the
>    command is still allowed to be active in the LLD and the LLD can
>    call scsi_done any time later (probably latest when the
>    eh_host_reset_handler flushes everything that is still pending).
> 
> 2) While the abort is pending, but before returning SUCCESS from
>    eh_abort_handler, the LLD can still call scsi_done for the SCSI
>    command to be aborted (the SCSI command might be returned with a
>    status "aborted" if the abort succeeds, or "good" if it was
>    completed just before the abort reached the storage system).
> 
> Is this correct? Are there any more limitations a SCSI LLD has to be
> aware of?
> 
> --
> Christof Schmitt
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Brian King
Linux on Power Virtualization
IBM Linux Technology Center



  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-24 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-24 11:41 eh_abort_handler and calling scsi_done Christof Schmitt
2009-03-24 13:29 ` Brian King [this message]
2009-03-24 14:34   ` Christof Schmitt
2009-03-24 17:46   ` Mike Anderson
2009-03-25  8:52     ` Christof Schmitt
2009-03-25 13:52       ` Brian King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49C8E055.2060108@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox