From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Xu Yang <onlyxuyang@qq.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
open-osd mailing-list <osd-dev@open-osd.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] libosd: BUG: blk_put_request called from within request_end_io
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:05:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D24D59.90807@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49D24BD3.2030801@panasas.com>
A fix for a very serious and stupid bug in osd_initiator. It
used to call blk_put_request() regardless of if it was from
the end_io callback or if called after a sync execution.
It should call the unlocked version __blk_put_request() instead.
Also fixed is the remove of _abort_unexecuted_bios hack, and use of
blk_end_request(,-ERROR,) to deallocate half baked requests. I've
audited the code and it should be safe.
Reported and
Tested-by: Xu Yang <onlyxuyang@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
index 552f58b..2a5f077 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c
@@ -338,20 +338,6 @@ struct osd_request *osd_start_request(struct osd_dev *dev, gfp_t gfp)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(osd_start_request);
-/*
- * If osd_finalize_request() was called but the request was not executed through
- * the block layer, then we must release BIOs.
- */
-static void _abort_unexecuted_bios(struct request *rq)
-{
- struct bio *bio;
-
- while ((bio = rq->bio) != NULL) {
- rq->bio = bio->bi_next;
- bio_endio(bio, 0);
- }
-}
-
static void _osd_free_seg(struct osd_request *or __unused,
struct _osd_req_data_segment *seg)
{
@@ -363,9 +349,30 @@ static void _osd_free_seg(struct osd_request *or __unused,
seg->alloc_size = 0;
}
+static void _put_request(struct request *rq , bool is_async)
+{
+ if (is_async) {
+ WARN_ON(rq->bio);
+ __blk_put_request(rq->q, rq);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * If osd_finalize_request() was called but the request was not
+ * executed through the block layer, then we must release BIOs.
+ * TODO: Keep error code in or->async_error. Need to audit all
+ * code paths.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(rq->bio))
+ blk_end_request(rq, -ENOMEM, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
+ else
+ blk_put_request(rq);
+ }
+}
+
void osd_end_request(struct osd_request *or)
{
struct request *rq = or->request;
+ /* IMPORTANT: make sure this agrees with osd_execute_request_async */
+ bool is_async = (or->request->end_io_data == or);
_osd_free_seg(or, &or->set_attr);
_osd_free_seg(or, &or->enc_get_attr);
@@ -373,12 +380,11 @@ void osd_end_request(struct osd_request *or)
if (rq) {
if (rq->next_rq) {
- _abort_unexecuted_bios(rq->next_rq);
- blk_put_request(rq->next_rq);
+ _put_request(rq->next_rq, is_async);
+ rq->next_rq = NULL;
}
- _abort_unexecuted_bios(rq);
- blk_put_request(rq);
+ _put_request(rq, is_async);
}
_osd_request_free(or);
}
--
1.6.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-31 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-31 16:58 [BUGFIX 0/2] BUG Fixes for OSD in mainline (2.6.30) Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-31 17:05 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-03-31 17:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] osd_uld: Remove creation of osd_scsi class symlink Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D24D59.90807@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=onlyxuyang@qq.com \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox