From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Request for pulling exofs for 2.6.30 Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:44:52 -0400 Message-ID: <49D4EB84.6020100@garzik.org> References: <49D4E70A.9090507@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49D4E70A.9090507@panasas.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , open-osd mailing-list , James Bottomley , Linux Kernel , linux-scsi , linux-fsdevel , Stephen Rothwell List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Boaz Harrosh wrote: > which is available in the git repository at: > > git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd.git for-linus > > Boaz Harrosh (9): > exofs: Kbuild, Headers and osd utils > exofs: file and file_inode operations > exofs: symlink_inode and fast_symlink_inode operations > exofs: address_space_operations > exofs: dir_inode and directory operations > exofs: super_operations and file_system_type > exofs: export_operations > exofs: Documentation > fs: Add exofs to Kernel build For what little weight I have in this area... ACK But I would suggest _not_ splitting up the add-filesystem patch. You really only want to split up this stuff for review. The add-exofs change is one single logical change, and splitting it up across multiple changesets is not the most optimal nor bisect-safe approach. Jeff