From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LSF: Multipathing and path checking question
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:10:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49ECC8BB.9020906@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49EC2B65.1050508@suse.de>
Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Today, instead of #2, the Red Hat multipath tools guy and I were talking
>> about doing a probe with SG_IO. For example we would send down a path
>> tester IO and then wait for it to be failed with DID_TRANSPORT_FAILFAST.
>>
> No. this is exactly what you cannot do. SG_IO will be stalled when the
> sdev is BLOCKED and will only return a result _after_ the sdev transitions
> _out_ of the BLOCKED state.
> Translated to FC this means that whenever dev_loss_tmo is _active_ (!)
> no I/O will be send out neither any I/O result will be returned to userland.
>
That is not true anymore. When fast io fail fires, the sdev and rport
will be blocked, but the the fc class will call into the LLD to have it
fail any IO still running in the driver. The FC class will then fail any
IO in the block queues, and then it will also fail any new IO sent to it.
With your patch to have multipath-tools set fast io fail for multipath,
then we should always get the IO failed before dev_loss_tmo fires.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-20 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 22:59 LSF: Multipathing and path checking question Mike Christie
2009-04-17 7:50 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-17 14:55 ` Mike Christie
2009-04-17 15:21 ` Mike Christie
2009-04-20 8:19 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-20 19:23 ` Mike Christie
2009-04-20 23:02 ` Mike Christie
2009-04-21 7:26 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-20 7:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-20 19:10 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2009-04-20 19:28 ` Mike Christie
2009-04-21 7:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49ECC8BB.9020906@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).